| Summary: | base.eclass base_src_unpack enchancement proposol | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Thomas Matthijs (RETIRED) <axxo> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Aron Griffis (RETIRED) <agriffis> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: | base.eclass patch | ||
Created attachment 34674 [details, diff]
base.eclass patch
nevermind |
I see alot of ebuild that just go unpack ${A} && cd {S} && epatch .... which is allready partly supported in base_src_unpack but not very nice imo because it doesn't use epatch, and its so hackish to have PATCHES & PATCHES1, and it never even calls 'patch' standard. therefor i prope a change in the order of the patch i'm attaching