Summary: | Repoman does not catch stable ebuild removal with Git | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Portage Development | Reporter: | Robin Johnson <robbat2> |
Component: | Repoman | Assignee: | Portage team <dev-portage> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | blueness, floppym, hasufell, infra-bugs |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=557246 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 557246 |
Description
Robin Johnson
2015-08-10 18:20:21 UTC
> Repoman is not detecting removal of stable ebuilds like in CVS.
Since when did it ever do that?
repoman has never checked for removal of the last stable ebuild. This is not a regression. I am lowering the priority.
From my CVS tree:
floppym@naomi pnmixer % pwd
/home/floppym/src/gentoo-x86/media-sound/pnmixer
floppym@naomi pnmixer % eshowkw
Keywords for media-sound/pnmixer:
| | u |
| a a a n p s | n |
| l m r h i m m i p s p | u s | r
| p d a m p a 6 i o p c 3 a x | s l | e
| h 6 r 6 p 6 8 p s p 6 9 s r 8 | e o | p
| a 4 m 4 a 4 k s 2 c 4 0 h c 6 | d t | o
----------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------
0.6_pre20111213 | o + o o o o o o o + o o o o + | o 0 | gentoo
0.6_pre20140924 | o ~ o o o o o o o ~ o o o o ~ | o | gentoo
9999 | o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o | o | gentoo
floppym@naomi pnmixer % cvs rm -f pnmixer-0.6_pre20111213.ebuild
cvs remove: use `cvs commit' to remove this file permanently
floppym@naomi pnmixer % repoman manifest && repoman full
>>> Creating Manifest for /home/floppym/src/gentoo-x86/media-sound/pnmixer
RepoMan scours the neighborhood...
ebuild.badheader 2
media-sound/pnmixer/pnmixer-0.6_pre20140924.ebuild: Malformed Id header on line: 3
media-sound/pnmixer/pnmixer-9999.ebuild: Malformed Id header on line: 3
Note: use --include-dev (-d) to check dependencies for 'dev' profiles
RepoMan sez: "You're only giving me a partial QA payment?
I'll take it this time, but I'm not happy."
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 236375 *** |