Summary: | x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.99.917 fails to start when built against >=x11-libs/libdrm-2.4.61 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Ilia Mirkin <imirkin> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo X packagers <x11> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | critical | ||
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Ilia Mirkin
2015-07-29 19:59:37 UTC
Sorry, typo. I meant libdrm 2.4.61+, not 2.4.51. Also, I believe, but haven't verified, that this issue happens any xf86-video-intel version, not just 2.99.917 (at least when using the sna backend), when built against the latest libdrm version. run today into a similar mess (stable amd64 hardened, ThinkPad T440s, i915, mesa-10.6.3, x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.99.91) - X11 was f*ed up. For me the it was sufficient to downgrade ~x11-base/xorg-server-1.17.2 to .1 and to re-emerge deps. (In reply to Toralf Förster from comment #3) > run today into a similar mess (stable amd64 hardened, ThinkPad T440s, i915, > mesa-10.6.3, x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.99.91) - X11 was f*ed up. > > For me the it was sufficient to downgrade ~x11-base/xorg-server-1.17.2 to .1 > and to re-emerge deps. Note that there's an issue with x11-proto/xproto-7.0.28 which causes an X server built against it to randomly die too, somewhere in Close* or something along those lines. There is a patch (to the X server) to fix it, but it has yet to be checked in: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg-devel/2015-July/046980.html However this bug is about segfault in the intel driver on startup, pretty sure that's only affected by newer libdrm versions. (And I note that there's a x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.99.917-r2 ebuild which includes the patch I suggested.) @Ilia, then could you try the -r2 ebuild if you're not using it? @Toralf, probably a different issue. Please open a separate bug. Thanks to both of you. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 552124 *** (In reply to Rémi Cardona from comment #5) > @Ilia, then could you try the -r2 ebuild if you're not using it? Hmmmm.... that is very surprising. It does seem like the -r2 ebuild was around when I filed this bug. Was I not using it somehow? Will reopen if it was not a case of PEBKAC. |