Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 536834

Summary: dev-scheme/guile: header install slightly broken
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: DaggyStyle <daggs>
Component: [OLD] Core systemAssignee: Scheme Project <scheme>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE    
Severity: normal CC: blueness
Priority: Normal    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---
Bug Depends on:    
Bug Blocks: 430702    
Attachments: patch

Description DaggyStyle 2015-01-17 12:26:57 UTC
a patch against hardened-dev git, musl branch to allow compilation of autogen-5.18.1

this patch isn't intended for inclusion to official portage tree, it is intended for the musl branch in the hardened-dev overlay.

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 DaggyStyle 2015-01-17 12:28:04 UTC
Created attachment 394154 [details, diff]
patch
Comment 2 DaggyStyle 2015-01-17 12:29:14 UTC
please assign to Anthony Basile
Comment 3 Felix Janda 2015-01-17 21:27:37 UTC
This is actually a bug in Guile's headers which has been fixed in Guile 2.0.10

http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=guile.git;a=commitdiff;h=36c40440078c005cd5e239cca487d29f6f60007d;hp=b1fe20c24ccb380420ea1ffdc7f249224072dcdc
Comment 4 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2015-01-19 07:26:55 UTC
What error would that print?
Comment 5 Felix Janda 2015-01-20 13:26:44 UTC
The problem is more precisely, that musl ships the header
<stdnoreturn.h> which is likely to become part of the next C Standard.
This header is supposed to define "noreturn" (used to mark functions
which don't return). musl uses "__attribute__((__noreturn__))" as the
definition for "noreturn". Now there is also guile's public header
<libguile/__scm.h> which defines "SCM_NORETURN" as
"__attribute__ ((noreturn))". So if <stdnoreturn.h> is included before
<libguile/__sch.h> we get "__attribute__ ((__attribute((__noreturn__))))
which of course throws an error. The linked commit fixes this problem.
Comment 6 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2015-02-10 21:42:55 UTC
doesn't look like it has anything to do with autogen
Comment 7 Anthony Basile gentoo-dev 2015-02-13 11:34:26 UTC
There is more history in bug #493464.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 493464 ***