Summary: | Mendeley license change | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Justin Lecher (RETIRED) <jlec> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Licenses team <licenses> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | marius.brehler+gentoo, xmw |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
new license
license in source archive |
Description
Justin Lecher (RETIRED)
2015-01-15 10:29:18 UTC
Created attachment 394028 [details]
new license
Created attachment 394078 [details]
license in source archive
Justin attached the updated license which is available via the mendeley homepage.
Further the tarball itself provides the binary identical files 'LICENSE' and 'share/doc/mendeleydesktop/License.txt'. This is similar but not identical, neither with the Mendeley-EULA nor with the updated license Justin attached.
Which one should be found in the /usr/portage/license folder?
(In reply to Marius Brehler from comment #2) > Created attachment 394078 [details] > license in source archive That's not a license. Okay, I just asked because this file is included as License.txt in the mendeley tarball. If it's not a license, only Justin's question has to be clarified. +*mendeleydesktop-1.13.1 (25 Jan 2015) + + 25 Jan 2015; Michael Weber <xmw@gentoo.org> + +files/mendeleydesktop-fix-python3.patch, +mendeleydesktop-1.13.1.ebuild, + -mendeleydesktop-1.12.1.ebuild, -mendeleydesktop-1.12.4.ebuild, metadata.xml: + Version bump (bug 536656, thanks Andrés Becerra Sandoval, Marius Brehler & + Alexander), changed license file (bug 536686), adding myself as co-maintainer. + I've added the new file and droped the old one after removing the old ebuilds + 25 Jan 2015; Justin Lecher <jlec@gentoo.org> license_groups: + Drop Mendeley-EULA and add Mendeley-terms to EULA group, #536686 + Are there still any issues open here, or could this bug be closed? |