Summary: | sys-apps/systemd-216-r2 USE=sysv-utils should not depend on <sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r4 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Christian Roessner <c> |
Component: | [OLD] Core system | Assignee: | Gentoo systemd Team <systemd> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | dev-portage |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Christian Roessner
2015-01-06 10:45:15 UTC
|| ( >=sys-apps/util-linux-2.22 <sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r4 ) -> util-linux should break the block for people using sysv-utils USE :/ Have you removed sys-apps/openrc from the system set? mkdir -p /etc/portage/profile echo "-*sys-apps/openrc" >> /etc/portage/profile/packages I tried this, but same problem: emerge -uDp @world These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [binary N ] sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r7 USE="(-ibm) (-selinux) -static" [binary N ] sys-apps/openrc-0.12.4 USE="ncurses netifrc pam unicode -debug -newnet (-prefix) (-selinux) -static-libs -tools" [blocks B ] sys-apps/sysvinit ("sys-apps/sysvinit" is blocking sys-apps/systemd-216-r2) * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be * installed at the same time on the same system. (sys-apps/systemd-216-r2:0/2::gentoo, installed) pulled in by >=sys-apps/systemd-44-r1[pam] required by (sys-auth/pambase-20120417-r3:0/0::gentoo, installed) sys-apps/systemd:0= required by (sys-apps/dbus-1.8.10:0/0::gentoo, installed) >=sys-apps/systemd-38 required by (virtual/logger-0:0/0::gentoo, installed) sys-apps/systemd required by (sys-fs/multipath-tools-0.5.0-r1:0/0::gentoo, installed) sys-apps/systemd:0/2= required by (sys-apps/dbus-1.8.10:0/0::gentoo, installed) sys-apps/systemd required by (app-emulation/libvirt-1.2.10-r3:0/1.2.10::gentoo, installed) sys-apps/systemd required by @selected sys-apps/systemd required by (sys-apps/util-linux-2.25.2-r1:0/0::gentoo, installed) >=sys-apps/systemd-209 required by (sys-process/procps-3.3.9-r2:0/0::gentoo, installed) sys-apps/systemd required by (dev-lang/php-5.5.20:5.5/5.5::gentoo, installed) sys-apps/systemd required by (net-misc/netctl-1.6:0/0::gentoo, installed) >=sys-apps/systemd-207 required by (sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration-4:0/0::gentoo, installed) >=sys-apps/systemd-212-r5:0/2[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?] (>=sys-apps/systemd-212-r5:0/2[abi_x86_64(-)]) required by (virtual/libudev-215-r1:0/1::gentoo, installed) sys-apps/systemd required by (virtual/service-manager-0:0/0::gentoo, installed) >=sys-apps/systemd-208:0 required by (virtual/udev-215:0/0::gentoo, installed) (sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r7:0/0::gentoo, binary scheduled for merge) pulled in by >=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.86-r6 required by (sys-apps/openrc-0.12.4:0/0::gentoo, binary scheduled for merge) For more information about Blocked Packages, please refer to the following section of the Gentoo Linux x86 Handbook (architecture is irrelevant): Please mask sys-apps/openrc so we can see what is trying to pull it in. I masked openrc, which led to netifrc, which led to lxc, which was an old version. I am currently building the newest version. Just ready. The problem was app-emulation-0.8.0-r2. I have now installed version 1.0.7 and this does no longer have dependencies to netifrc and openrc. Thanks very much for tracking this problem! It is bad that there is no "stable" lxc. I had added the former version with =app-emulation/lxc-0.8.0-r2, so when this release was purged from the portage tree, I did not recognize this. No problem. A bit late to the party but maybe we can just remove the old sysvinit from the ||, and leave just util-linux? This should make a thing or two easier. (In reply to Michał Górny from comment #7) > A bit late to the party but maybe we can just remove the old sysvinit from > the ||, and leave just util-linux? This should make a thing or two easier. This has already been done in >=sys-apps/systemd-217. Is it worth revbumping the stable ebuild for this? Ah, ok then. Forget about me :). |