| Summary: | elisp-common.eclass contains mutually exclusive instructions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | John Altstadt <altstadt> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Emacs project <emacs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
|
Description
John Altstadt
2004-06-05 16:56:25 UTC
Previously site-start.el was generated by Portage and users couldn't have their own site-start.el. A number of people complained about this ``feature'', so we decided to use site-gentoo.el for Gentoo stuff and let users load it themselves if they want to use it. If you are new to use Gentoo, you don't need to remove site-start.el (rather I assume you don't have one). The first part is for existing users who may have old site-start.el generated by Portage. Since we no longer manage site-start.el by Portage, users should load site-gentoo.el either by site-start.el or by .emacs file, that's all. I mark this bug as INVALID but feel free to post any questions if anything unclear. Suggestions/improvements about the einfo are also welcomed. I still have serious objections to the text of the einfo. Removing the site-start.el file is very much the wrong thing to do. If a casual emacs user, such as myself, actually removes this file, then everything loaded by this file ceases to work. When I tested out the newly emerged package, I was able to figure out that following the directions in the einfo had rendered htmlfontify non-functional. Fortunately I was able to restore the file from backup. I would change the first part of the einfo to say something like: * All site initialization for Gentoo-installed packages is now added to * /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-gentoo.el; site-start.el is no longer * managed by Gentoo. You are responsible for all maintenance of * site-start.el if there is such a file. which can then be followed by the rest of the text that implies that site-start.el is a somewhat important file. Thanks for the comment. I changed that part accordingly. |