Bug 529964 – Gnome* maintained packages stabilization list for November

• Product: Gentoo Linux
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Description Pacho Ramos 2014-11-20 15:36:50 UTC]

Will attach the list shortly

[Comment 1 Pacho Ramos 2014-11-20 16:15:34 UTC]

Created attachment 389902 [details]
gnome-list

[Comment 2 Pacho Ramos 2014-11-24 10:38:23 UTC]

Created attachment 390182 [details]
gnome-list

Drop qof to allow faster stabilization, add latest libbonobo*/libgnome ebuilds too

[Comment 3 Pacho Ramos 2014-11-24 12:04:45 UTC]

Created attachment 390192 [details]
gnome-list

[Comment 4 Pacho Ramos 2014-11-25 09:07:52 UTC]

Created attachment 390244 [details]
gnome-list

[Comment 5 Pacho Ramos 2014-11-25 13:46:17 UTC]

Created attachment 390272 [details]
gnome-list

[Comment 6 Pacho Ramos 2014-11-25 15:13:56 UTC]

Created attachment 390276 [details]
gnome-list

[Comment 7 Pacho Ramos 2014-11-25 15:19:55 UTC]

Created attachment 390278 [details]
gnome-list

[Comment 8 Pacho Ramos 2014-12-05 12:04:17 UTC]

Created attachment 390986 [details]
gnome-list

[Comment 9 Pacho Ramos 2014-12-05 12:41:35 UTC]

Created attachment 390992 [details]
gnome-list

[Comment 10 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2014-12-12 12:03:42 UTC]

(In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #9)
> Created attachment 390992 [details]
> gnome-list

I skipped net-libs/uhttpmock on HPPA since nothing seems to require it. Maybe dev-libs/libgdata but nothing seems to require that on HPPA either.

[Comment 11 Pacho Ramos 2014-12-12 12:13:18 UTC]

Created attachment 391492 [details]
gnome-list

Yeah, net-libs/uhttpmock is only really needed on amd64/x86 :)

[Comment 12 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2014-12-12 12:23:26 UTC]

(In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #11)
> Created attachment 391492 [details]
> gnome-list
> 
> Yeah, net-libs/uhttpmock is only really needed on amd64/x86 :)

Not quite. Newer claws-mail will want dev-libs/libgdata stable shortly.

So I went ahead and marked both stable anyway. Stable for HPPA.

[Comment 13 Pacho Ramos 2014-12-12 12:29:21 UTC]

(In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #12)
[...]
> Not quite. Newer claws-mail will want dev-libs/libgdata stable shortly.
> 
> So I went ahead and marked both stable anyway. Stable for HPPA.

As you prefer, anyway, for remaining arches, they can skip it if they prefer as it's not required yet. They will be able to stabilize it if really needed in the future

[Comment 14 Alexander Tsoy 2014-12-15 10:40:01 UTC]

>=dev-libs/folks-0.10 and probably some other packages from stabilization list are masked now.

[Comment 15 Pacho Ramos 2014-12-15 14:30:54 UTC]

It was a temporal problem only

[Comment 16 Pacho Ramos 2014-12-15 16:27:29 UTC]

Created attachment 391782 [details]
gnome-list

pitivi was listed by error ;)

[Comment 17 Pacho Ramos 2014-12-18 15:03:39 UTC]

x86 stable

[Comment 18 Pacho Ramos 2014-12-19 13:45:12 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 19 Agostino Sarubbo 2014-12-28 12:26:15 UTC]

ppc stable

[Comment 20 Agostino Sarubbo 2014-12-30 10:11:28 UTC]

ppc64 stable

[Comment 21 Agostino Sarubbo 2014-12-31 09:20:03 UTC]

ia64 stable

[Comment 22 Agostino Sarubbo 2015-01-01 08:41:17 UTC]

sparc stable

[Comment 23 Markus Meier 2015-01-01 21:18:15 UTC]

arm stable

[Comment 24 Agostino Sarubbo 2015-01-02 12:11:47 UTC]

alpha stable. Closing.