Summary: | =www-servers/uwsgi-2.0.9: Stable request | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Marc Schiffbauer <mschiff> |
Component: | [OLD] Keywording and Stabilization | Assignee: | Ultrabug <ultrabug> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | STABLEREQ |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Marc Schiffbauer
2014-11-13 12:24:28 UTC
Marc, 1.4.x is old stuff I intend to drop from tree pretty soon. Would you agree for a 2.0.8-r1 stabilization instead ? Should be ok I think. Thanks. Ok let's do this please arches :) thanks ! dependency.bad 22 www-servers/uwsgi/uwsgi-2.0.8-r1.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0) ['dev-lang/ruby:2.1'] (In reply to Agostino Sarubbo from comment #4) > dependency.bad 22 > www-servers/uwsgi/uwsgi-2.0.8-r1.ebuild: DEPEND: > amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0) ['dev-lang/ruby:2.1'] I saw it yep before filling but tbh I was not sure whether I should drop a whole language version support because it had no stable release yet. And asking a ruby-2.1 stabilization for this (or even depending on it) sounds quite a huge trade for such a pkg. I tried to ping you on IRC, plz advise with the best course in your opinion mate. Thanks a lot and sorry, I know this gets annoying for you to see bad deps upon stabilization. As advised by @graaf I dropped ruby21 from the 2.0.8-r1 ebuild, you can now proceed, thanks Ping? (In reply to Marc Schiffbauer from comment #7) > Ping? /me facepalms ;( I totally forgot to add arches lol Let's go for uwsgi-2.0.9 then... sorry mate amd64 stable x86 stable, closing |