Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 528704

Summary: app-crypt/gnupg-2.1.0 has no keywords
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: mitzip <mitzip>
Component: Current packagesAssignee: Crypto team [DISABLED] <crypto+disabled>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE    
Severity: normal CC: mrueg
Priority: Normal    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---
Bug Depends on: 528460    
Bug Blocks:    

Description mitzip 2014-11-09 03:17:59 UTC
I'd like to see this version unmasked so I can start creating non-interoperable keys as soon as possible. ;-) diggin' me some eliptical curves!

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge -av gnupg
2. no ecc
3. cry



Thanks!
Comment 1 mitzip 2014-11-09 03:21:59 UTC
For your viewing pleasure...

https://www.gnupg.org/faq/whats-new-in-2.1.html
Comment 2 Kristian Fiskerstrand (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2014-11-10 02:00:37 UTC
No keywords for gnupg 2.1.0 is intentional at this point while it undergoes more testing and some issues, including bug 528460 that blocks a proper upgrade path is solved. 

There are also minor issues such as http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=19002 that have been reported.  

We welcome testing and bug reports by simply adding "app-crypt/gnupg **" to the local package.accept_keywords.
Comment 3 Matthew Thode ( prometheanfire ) archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2015-01-12 11:20:52 UTC
do we have a list of blockers on this (upstream or here).  also, I thought gnupg had format changes on minor releases as a mater of course.
Comment 4 Kristian Fiskerstrand (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2015-01-12 11:37:16 UTC
(In reply to Matthew Thode ( prometheanfire ) from comment #3)
> do we have a list of blockers on this (upstream or here).  also, I thought
> gnupg had format changes on minor releases as a mater of course.

The largest issue I consider blocking atm is the HKPS SNI issue[0]. Except for that it is very nice if people start using GnuPG 2.1 and report issues, but there isn't anything in 2.1 that should indicate a too swift of a move over to it, in particular until some other bugs are fixed, e.g. LDAP support is not yet implemented in dirmngr for OpenPGP keyservers that disables interoperability with enterprise systems such as Symantec Encryption Server that publish employee public keys in LDAP, and it is still possibility of format changes for ECC keys as the EdDSA I-D is not formally accepted or IANA registrered for algoid 22. 

References:
[0] http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2014-November/051471.html
Comment 5 Kristian Fiskerstrand (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2015-04-13 20:02:51 UTC
I forgot about this bug report. keywordreq is now active in bug 546478

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 546478 ***