Summary: | app-misc/ddccontrol-0.4.2_p20140105-r1 - segmentation fault in __memmove_sse2 (dest=<optimized out>, src=<optimized out>, len=<optimized out>) at ../string/memmove.c:85 when trying to use an ADL(fglrx) display | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Jelte Fennema <gentoobugzilla> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | No maintainer - Look at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers if you want to take care of it <maintainer-needed> |
Status: | RESOLVED UPSTREAM | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | alex_y_xu, treecleaner |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | NeedPatch, PMASKED |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | Pending removal: 2016-09-21 | ||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
Normal output
Stacktrace emerge --info Backtrace |
Description
Jelte Fennema
2014-10-28 18:13:29 UTC
Created attachment 387670 [details]
Normal output
Created attachment 387672 [details]
Stacktrace
Created attachment 387674 [details]
emerge --info
Comment on attachment 387672 [details] Stacktrace > ! $ î° root@g2-pc î° /h/jelte î° gdb /usr/bin/ddccontrol >Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >0x00007ffff78aceef in __memmove_sse2 (dest=<optimized out>, src=<optimized out>, len=<optimized out>) at ../string/memmove.c:85 >85 BYTE_COPY_FWD (dstp, srcp, len); And now run `backtrace full' Created attachment 387686 [details]
Backtrace
(In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #4) > And now run `backtrace full' Sorry forgot the most important part. Upstream looks dead and I wonder if this will be fixed ever... maybe this should be treecleaned (In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #7) > Upstream looks dead and I wonder if this will be fixed ever... maybe this > should be treecleaned it is not totally broken, only using the ADL backend. using i2c-dev it works perfectly fine here. It works with Intel GPU Can we keep this, please. Works with intel G965 and intel GPU here. I'm using it fine via i2c on an older radeon too. I can keep using the ebuild via my personal overlay, ofc, but I don't see it hurting anyone as it is now. I'm using this with nvidia using i2c without problems as well, would appreciate it if this package can be kept in the tree. Maybe adding a warning on install/emerge about the ADL backend is an option? Can the ADL backend be disable in some way? --disable-amdadl should do the trick [master 410181b] app-misc/ddccontrol: amdadl is broken, disable it (#527268) 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename app-misc/ddccontrol/{ddccontrol-0.4.2_p20140105-r1.ebuild => ddccontrol-0.4.2_p20140105-r2.ebuild} (94%) |