| Summary: | net-im/sigram - a different telegram client | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Sergio Durán <arambuladuransergio> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Default Assignee for New Packages <maintainer-wanted> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | alexandre.guimaraes, bugs+gentoo, gentoo, kripton |
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | http://labs.sialan.org/projects/sigram | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
|
Description
Sergio Durán
2014-10-11 00:53:38 UTC
I am looking for that too but this one depends on qt5 which is still masked on portage. :-( $URL is not working, maybe change to this one? https://github.com/sialan-labs/sigram And qt5 is not masked anymore and also stable! I just see that there seems to be no active development in sigram since nearly a year now, so close this bug? Sigram was forked into Cutegram (Bug #545146) Indeed, it was forked. And while the repository on Github ( https://github.com/Aseman-Land/Cutegram ) does not seem very active, some of it is developed on private repositories and only pushed to GH on updates. So it is still actively maintained. I'd also vote for closing this bug. There is Linux desktop version now. Not in portage tree yet but already was a opened bug report: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=537266 Anyway, I vote to close this bug (sigram) one too. Closed: No active development and forked to cutegram. Thanks for letting us know. |
