Summary: | sys-cluster/ceph uses readme.gentoo.eclass install phase even if ebuild takes care of installation itself | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Martin Kletzander <mkletzan> |
Component: | Eclasses | Assignee: | Yixun Lan <dlan> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | cluster |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Martin Kletzander
2014-09-23 12:21:34 UTC
Open bugs for packages using the install phase instead of readme.gentoo_create_doc then (the default phases will be dropped in eapi6 for this eclass... but ebuilds should simply call readme.gentoo_create_doc if they are installing the rest manually or using other eclass providing src_install phase) (In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #1) > Open bugs for packages using the install phase instead of > readme.gentoo_create_doc then => I mean packages that are handling install phase themselves of course, if they are not doing anything special at that time they can use the phase of course (as they can do for any other eclass providing phase functions) > (the default phases will be dropped in eapi6 > for this eclass... but ebuilds should simply call readme.gentoo_create_doc > if they are installing the rest manually or using other eclass providing > src_install phase) ceph maintainer, I see two options: - replace "default" by readme.gentoo_src_install at the top of install function - replace readme.gentoo_src_install with readme.gentoo_create_doc readme.gentoo_src_install phase runs "default && readme.gentoo_create_doc" Thank you for handling this bug. Are there some options other than filing bugs for each package separately? I'd gladly send some global patch or something if there's such possibility. + 24 Sep 2014; Yixun Lan <dlan@gentoo.org> ceph-0.67.9.ebuild, + ceph-0.67.10.ebuild, ceph-0.80.5.ebuild, ceph-9999.ebuild: + fix libtool archives issue, readme.gentoo related, bug 523522 fixed without revision bump, and I take the second approach, thanks |