Summary: | =dev-tex/pgf-3.0.1 stable request | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Florian Schmaus <flow> |
Component: | Stabilization | Assignee: | TeX project <tex> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | STABLEREQ |
Priority: | Normal | Flags: | kensington:
sanity-check+
|
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: |
=dev-tex/pgf-3.0.1
|
Runtime testing required: | --- |
Bug Depends on: | 536622 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 556004 |
Description
Florian Schmaus
2014-09-11 15:10:25 UTC
Bug #536622 seems to be only triggered if "\usepackage{preview}" is used. Could some adjust #536622's title? I don't think this should block pgf-3 stabilization, especially since a workaround[1] exists. 1: http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/192649/1280 (In reply to Florian Schmaus from comment #1) > Bug #536622 seems to be only triggered if "\usepackage{preview}" is used. > Could some adjust #536622's title? I don't think this should block pgf-3 > stabilization, especially since a workaround[1] exists. > > 1: http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/192649/1280 it is not blocking pgf3 stabilization but rather bug #536622 is blocked until pgf3 is stable (In reply to Alexis Ballier from comment #2) > it is not blocking pgf3 stabilization but rather bug #536622 is blocked > until pgf3 is stable Are you sure that you didn't confuse the dependency direction of those two bugs? #536622 is triggered by pgf-3, so if it becomes stable (what this bug is about) more users would actually hit the bug, instead of the bug being fixed. Also https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536622 shows "Blocks: 522588". And this issue only lists #556004 as blocked. (In reply to Florian Schmaus from comment #3) > (In reply to Alexis Ballier from comment #2) > > it is not blocking pgf3 stabilization but rather bug #536622 is blocked > > until pgf3 is stable > > Are you sure that you didn't confuse the dependency direction of those two > bugs? #536622 is triggered by pgf-3, so if it becomes stable (what this bug > is about) more users would actually hit the bug, instead of the bug being > fixed. > beamer should be stabilized first, yes > Also https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536622 shows "Blocks: 522588". > And this issue only lists #556004 as blocked. yes let's go for 3.0.1 amd64 stable x86 stable ppc stable ia64 stable arm stable Stable on alpha. Dear Maintainer (or who is mainly involved in this stable request), This is an auto-generated message that will move the current component to the new component Stabilization. To ensure that the stabilization will proceed correctly, please fill the fields "Atoms to stabilize" and "Runtime testing required" as described here: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/4b2ef0e9aa7588224b8ae799c5fe31fa ppc64 stable sparc stable Stable for HPPA. Closing. |