| Summary: | app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs-20140508 - segmentation fault in ? at ? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Benjamin Budai <bb> |
| Component: | [OLD] Library | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers> |
| Status: | RESOLVED NEEDINFO | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | AMD64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/Backtraces | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: | emerge --info | ||
|
Description
Benjamin Budai
2014-08-19 10:26:23 UTC
Please post your `emerge -vpq app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs' output in a comment. (In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #1) > Please post your `emerge -vpq app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs' output in > a comment. Here it is: [ebuild R ] app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs-20140508 USE="(development) opengl" ABI_X86="(-32)" strace traces system calls and signals - it doesn't give any insight in segmentation faults. Please obtain a gdb backtrace instead. (In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #3) > strace traces system calls and signals - it doesn't give any insight in > segmentation faults. Please obtain a gdb backtrace instead. Well, there _is_ a gdb backtrace in my initial report. (In reply to Benjamin Budai from comment #4) > Well, there _is_ a gdb backtrace in my initial report. Yes, and it has question marks where the good bits should be. (In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #5) > (In reply to Benjamin Budai from comment #4) > > Well, there _is_ a gdb backtrace in my initial report. > > Yes, and it has question marks where the good bits should be. That's true. I compiled and linked my program with -g, not stripped. The program blows in glibc (or kernel?) which is stripped. Should I rebuild glibc with splitdebug? Rebuilding sys-libs/glibc-2.17 solved the issue. No more segfaults. Looks like bug #463918. |