| Summary: | Kernel descriptions need update | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [OLD] Docs-user | Reporter: | Sven Vermeulen (RETIRED) <swift> |
| Component: | Other | Assignee: | Docs Team <docs-team> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| URL: | http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-kernel.xml | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
|
Description
Sven Vermeulen (RETIRED)
2004-05-25 00:57:07 UTC
Along with this the install guide "http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1&chap=7" lists various kernels. It calls the development-sources "vanilla 2.6 kernels" which to me means it's kernels straight from kernel.org with no patches (ala vanilla-sources). However, the kernel list says development-sources are the stable 2.6 kernels and I assume they have Gentoo patches in them. To me this is a discrepancy. Why not just have the install guide link to the kernel list so the list only needs to be maintained in one place. Brett: it is not a discrepancy. It's just like the handbook says. development-sources : the 2.6.x vanilla sources from kernel.org gentoo-dev-sources : the gentoo-patched 2.6.x sources Adding the latter to the the list in http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-kernel.xml should clear things up. |