Summary: | dev-java/oracle-jdk-bin-1.7.0.72 version bump | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Tiziano Müller (RETIRED) <dev-zero> |
Component: | [OLD] Java | Assignee: | Java team <java> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | bagzy92, christian.kotz, fermuch, kentnl, martin, mbakhoff, robink, sven.koehler, wyvern5 |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525464 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
.65 -> .67 patch
Manifest update |
Description
Tiziano Müller (RETIRED)
2014-08-06 08:03:59 UTC
Also, the download url for 1.7.0.65 binaries is now redirecting to 1.7.0.67 binaries which makes it more difficult to install the older ebuild. Please also update dev-java/java-sdk-docs, because 1.7.0.60 also now redirects to 7u67. Thanks! Created attachment 382604 [details, diff]
.65 -> .67 patch
Created attachment 382606 [details]
Manifest update
New Manifest entries for all downloads of update 67.
*** Bug 519538 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 519576 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Version bump made on 10th August - 1.7.0.67 is now available as unstable. Should this bug be updated? *** Bug 520682 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 521376 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** The download info in should also point to the archive page (http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/archive-139210.html) to avoid bug reports when the latest version isn't in portage. (In reply to Johann Schmitz (ercpe) from comment #10) > The download info in should also point to the archive page > (http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/archive-139210.html) to avoid bug > reports when the latest version isn't in portage. That page requires the user to navigate to the correct version they need to download and could be confusing to some. (In reply to Anthony Basile from comment #11) > That page requires the user to navigate to the correct version they need to > download and could be confusing to some. Well, than to the sub pages for Java SE 7 / 8. 1.7.0.67 is in portage right now, but it fails to unpack for me even though the checksum test passes. Is it failing for anybody else? (In reply to Sven from comment #13) > 1.7.0.67 is in portage right now, but it fails to unpack for me even though > the checksum test passes. Is it failing for anybody else? Same problem (In reply to Oschtan from comment #14) > (In reply to Sven from comment #13) > > 1.7.0.67 is in portage right now, but it fails to unpack for me even though > > the checksum test passes. Is it failing for anybody else? > > Same problem Then you might want to check the permission of the file. In my case, I had to chown portage and chmod a+r the files. Apparently, the checksum checks run as root and the unpacking as the portage user. Re: Unpack, https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491264 seems to be a better bug for that. *** Bug 527276 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** +*oracle-jdk-bin-1.7.0.71 (01 Nov 2014) + + 01 Nov 2014; Johann Schmitz <ercpe@gentoo.org> + +oracle-jdk-bin-1.7.0.71.ebuild: + Oracle JDK update to latest cpu release + 04 Nov 2014; Johann Schmitz <ercpe@gentoo.org> + +emul-linux-x86-java-1.7.0.72.ebuild: + Version bump to 1.7.0.72 + 04 Nov 2014; Johann Schmitz <ercpe@gentoo.org> + +oracle-jre-bin-1.7.0.72.ebuild: + Version bump to 1.7.0.72 + 04 Nov 2014; Johann Schmitz <ercpe@gentoo.org> + +oracle-jdk-bin-1.7.0.72.ebuild: + Version bump to 1.7.0.72 (bug #519182) + 04 Nov 2014; Johann Schmitz <ercpe@gentoo.org> +java-sdk-docs-1.7.0.72.ebuild: + Version bump to 1.7.0.72 |