| Summary: | app-arch/arj-3.10.22-r8 with sys-devel/clang miscompiles postproc - ./linux-gnu/en/rs/tools/postproc linux-gnu/en/rs/arj/arj: Patch not found | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Jauhien Piatlicki (RETIRED) <jauhien> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | No maintainer - Look at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers if you want to take care of it <maintainer-needed> |
| Status: | CONFIRMED --- | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | esigra, llvm, lssndrbarbieri, sam, StormByte, theprogrammernerd, toralf, wizardedit |
| Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | PATCH |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 408963, 915000 | ||
| Attachments: |
build.log
Fix build errors by using the latest version of patches from Debian. arj-3.10.22_p26.ebuild |
||
Created attachment 395286 [details, diff]
Fix build errors by using the latest version of patches from Debian.
This has nothing to do with clang. I also get POSTPROC errors when trying to compile arj with gcc. The attached patch allowed arj to compile.
Austin, I saw you added PATCH keyword... this package has no maintainer, then, feel free to go ahead and fix it directly if you want :) (In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #2) > Austin, I saw you added PATCH keyword... this package has no maintainer, > then, feel free to go ahead and fix it directly if you want :) Thanks for the reminder. I looked closer, that patch is already in tree, but building still fails with clang-3.5. I'll look closer at the failure. Assigning to myself. Looks like there's (at least) one file being miscompiled. The current failure, with arj-3.10.22-r6 is: POSTPROC v 1.30 [17/01/2003] Not a part of any binary package! Patch not found GNUmakefile:403: recipe for target 'linux-gnu/en/rs/rearj/rearj' failed replacing linux-gnu/en/rs/rearj/rearj with one compiled with gcc allows that command to succeed. Same with gcc6 Title needs to be changed because it can be reproduced with clang-12 (2021) so this bug is still valid regardless a bit old. *** Bug 871006 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Created attachment 863365 [details]
arj-3.10.22_p26.ebuild
I took a look at cranking this up to the latest Debian patchset at least, but the result wouldn't then work with GCC (13, anyway).
clang-lld_tinderbox has reproduced this issue with version 3.10.22-r8 - Updating summary. |
Created attachment 376490 [details] build.log Build log attached.