Summary: | =sci-astronomy/wcslib-4.21 CFLAGS=-flto - .../work/wcslib-4.21/utils/wcsware.c:155: undefined reference to `wcspih' | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | David Kredba <kredba> |
Component: | [OLD] Library | Assignee: | Gentoo Astronomy project <sci-astronomy> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | AMD64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 618550 | ||
Attachments: | -j1 build.log |
Description
David Kredba
2014-04-04 18:15:24 UTC
Please attach the entire build log to this bug report. Created attachment 374308 [details]
-j1 build.log
(In reply to David Kredba from comment #0) > LDFLAGS="-flto=4 -fuse-linker-plugin -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-O2 -Wl,-flto -O2 > -ggdb -pipe -march=core2 -mtune=core2 -mno-3dnow -mno-sse4.2 -mno-avx > -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-sse4a" could you try with reasonable LDFLAGS? OK :-) Fails the same way with LDFLAGS="-Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-O2 -Wl,-flto" Thank you. One more note about how to reproduce it. I am using trunk binutils where patch for slim-LTO and linker plugin autoloading is present already. Should I go upstream to ask them if they can think about slim-LTO support in configure? Thank you. (In reply to David Kredba from comment #5) > One more note about how to reproduce it. I am using trunk binutils where > patch for slim-LTO and linker plugin autoloading is present already. > > Should I go upstream to ask them if they can think about slim-LTO support in > configure? > yes probably better. giving them a patch is probably the best bet though, given the bleeding edge nature of this. fixed upstream and current versions. |