Bug 502290 – dev-lisp/picolisp - a fast and lightweight Lisp interpreter

• Product: Gentoo Linux
• Status: CONFIRMED ---

[Description Constantine Bytensky 2014-02-24 00:24:41 UTC]

Created attachment 371148 [details]
dev-lisp/picolisp-3.1.5.ebuild

New ebuild for great developement system PicoLisp.

http://picolisp.com


Description from site:

PicoLisp: The Scalpel of Programming
A Radical Approach to Software Development

If some programming languages claim to be the "Swiss Army Knife of Programming", then PicoLisp may well be called the "Scalpel of Programming": Sharp, accurate, small and lightweight, but also dangerous in the hand of the inexperienced.

Less is more! - The maxim is: Keep it simple, and the programmer in control!

[Comment 1 Constantine Bytensky 2014-02-26 00:02:08 UTC]

Created attachment 371270 [details]
dev-lisp/picolisp-3.1.5.ebuild

[Comment 2 Constantine Bytensky 2014-02-26 00:03:29 UTC]

Created attachment 371272 [details]
dev-lisp/picolisp-9999.ebuild

Same contents as previous

[Comment 3 Panagiotis Christopoulos (RETIRED) 2014-04-13 21:04:03 UTC]

I'm working on the ebuild and will push it on the tree after some testing, do you mind if I drop multilib support for the moment cause the ebuild fails at all on my no-multilib profiled box? Also, is there a specific reason for the sstrip stuff you're doing in src_install?

Btw, Please reply to me here or by email with your full name in Latin characters so that I can credit you properly. Thank you for the ebuild and the bug.

[Comment 4 Panagiotis Christopoulos (RETIRED) 2014-04-13 21:26:04 UTC]

Now in lisp overlay.

http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/lisp.git;a=commit;h=a352f2b53c26c8c60b3e2094ded4e16bdb9ef1fc

[Comment 5 Constantine Bytensky 2014-05-27 23:00:37 UTC]

Sorry for long answer, now I turned on email notifications.

> do you mind if I drop multilib support for the moment cause the ebuild fails
> at all on my no-multilib profiled box?

Do you mean to drop no-multilib support? It's ok for now.

But I wish to add support for no-multilib. There is a problem: to build 64-bit version of PicoLisp other instance of PicoLisp needed. Either 32-bit version of PicoLisp that written in C and can be built by GCC, or Ersatz (Java version of Picolisp) that requires JDK, or prebuilt PicoLisp.

Some solutions:

* Add "java" use-flag to build by Ersatz.
* Make a prebuilt PicoLisp64, add it to distfiles and use it to build local PicoLisp.

What solution do you think is the best?

> Also, is there a specific reason for
> the sstrip stuff you're doing in src_install?

No. I used it in my overlay and I like minimum size.

> Btw, Please reply to me here or by email with your full name in Latin
> characters so that I can credit you properly.

Here is my full name transliterated from Ukrainian:
Kostyatyn Bytenskyi.

In English manner:
Constantine Bytenski.

[Comment 6 Constantine Bytensky 2014-10-17 20:22:52 UTC]

Created attachment 386818 [details]
dev-lisp/picolisp-9999.ebuild

[Comment 7 Constantine Bytensky 2014-10-17 20:23:42 UTC]

Created attachment 386820 [details]
dev-lisp/picolisp-3.1.5.ebuild

[Comment 8 Constantine Bytensky 2014-10-17 20:24:23 UTC]

Created attachment 386822 [details]
dev-lisp/picolisp-3.1.8.ebuild

[Comment 9 Constantine Bytensky 2014-10-17 20:32:57 UTC]

Created attachment 386824 [details]
picolisp-3.1.8.ebuild

[Comment 10 Constantine Bytensky 2014-10-17 20:33:26 UTC]

Created attachment 386826 [details]
picolisp-9999.ebuild

[Comment 11 Constantine Bytensky 2014-10-17 20:35:42 UTC]

I added support for non-multilib.
Also I removed sstrip and did some minor changes.

[Comment 12 Constantine Bytensky 2015-01-05 12:06:38 UTC]

Is anybody here?

[Comment 13 Panagiotis Christopoulos (RETIRED) 2015-01-05 16:22:08 UTC]

I'm here but working on other stuff atm. I'll try work on this later this month, if not please remind me. Thank you for your work.

[Comment 14 Myckel Habets 2015-01-05 20:44:05 UTC]

Don't add arch testing teams to non-arch testing bugs. Removing x86 and amd64.

[Comment 15 Constantine Bytensky 2016-10-01 17:11:09 UTC]

Created attachment 448710 [details]
picolisp-9999.ebuild

[Comment 16 Constantine Bytensky 2016-10-01 17:12:22 UTC]

Created attachment 448712 [details]
picolisp-16.6.ebuild

Is anybody here?

[Comment 17 Chema Alonso Josa (RETIRED) 2016-10-02 13:42:10 UTC]

Thanks for your work and sorry for this long delay.

I've pushed this ebuild to the overlay with some changes to improve its quality:

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/lisp.git/commit/?id=de410db0d5c7eea1f48d21b7a1664fc39bbf3aaa

Please, check that everything is ok and reopen this bug if necessary.

[Comment 18 Constantine Bytensky 2021-03-11 15:09:06 UTC]

Created attachment 690762 [details]
picolisp-9999.ebuild

[Comment 19 Constantine Bytensky 2021-03-11 15:11:33 UTC]

I made updated ebuild for pil21, which uses Clang.

I dont’t know what to do to share new version of ebuild, so I changed status of this bug.

[Comment 20 Constantine Bytensky 2021-08-01 08:35:04 UTC]

Created attachment 728949 [details]
picolisp-9999.ebuild