Bug 502254

Summary:	After recent libjpeg-turbo upgrade media-video/mpeg-tools cannot be built anymore
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Paul Osmialowski <newchief>
Component:	Current packages	Assignee:	Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers>
Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE
Severity:	normal
Priority:	Normal
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---

Description Paul Osmialowski 2014-02-23 15:38:02 UTC

I upgraded libjpeg-turbo, then during 'emerge @preserved-rebuild' mpeg-tools was supposed to be rebuilt. It failed.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge --sync && emerge --metadata
2. emerge -uND world
3. emerge @preserved-rebuild
... or just simply re-emerge mpeg-tools with latest libjpeg-turbo
Actual Results:  
jpeg.c: In function 'ReadJPEG':
jpeg.c:516:50: error: 'struct jpeg_decompress_struct' has no member named 'min_DCT_v_scaled_size'
jpeg.c:582:7: warning: implicit declaration of function 'jcopy_sample_rows' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
jpeg.c: In function 'JMovie2JPEG':
jpeg.c:325:8: warning: ignoring return value of 'fread', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
jpeg.c:344:12: warning: ignoring return value of 'fread', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
jpeg.c:354:11: warning: ignoring return value of 'read', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
jpeg.c:357:8: warning: ignoring return value of 'read', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
jpeg.c:358:8: warning: ignoring return value of 'read', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
jpeg.c:361:11: warning: ignoring return value of 'read', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
jpeg.c:362:11: warning: ignoring return value of 'read', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
make: *** [jpeg.o] Error 1


Expected Results:  
no error

Comment 1 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2014-02-23 18:59:40 UTC

Stabilization is in bug 495822

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 479462 ***