Bug 498366

Summary:	=www-client/google-chrome-33.0.1750.29_beta1 with =www-client/google-chrome-32.0.1700.77_p1 - slot conflict in /opt/google/chrome/locales
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) <jer>
Component:	Current packages	Assignee:	Mike Gilbert <floppym>
Status:	RESOLVED INVALID
Severity:	normal	CC:	chromium, xmw
Priority:	Normal
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---

Description Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2014-01-17 15:32:50 UTC

* Searching all installed packages for file collisions...
 * 
 * Press Ctrl-C to Stop
 * 
 * www-client/google-chrome-33.0.1750.29_beta1:beta::gentoo
 *      /opt/google/chrome/chrome
 *      /opt/google/chrome/chrome-sandbox
 *      /opt/google/chrome/chrome_100_percent.pak
 *      /opt/google/chrome/locales/en-GB.pak
 *      /opt/google/chrome/locales/en-US.pak
 *      /opt/google/chrome/locales/nl.pak
 *      /opt/google/chrome/resources.pak
 *      /usr/share/applications/google-chrome.desktop
 *      /usr/share/gnome-control-center/default-apps/google-chrome.xml
 *      /usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps/google-chrome.png
 *      /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/google-chrome.png
 *      /usr/share/icons/hicolor/22x22/apps/google-chrome.png
 *      /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps/google-chrome.png
 *      /usr/share/icons/hicolor/256x256/apps/google-chrome.png
 *      /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/google-chrome.png
 *      /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/google-chrome.png
 *      /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps/google-chrome.png
 *      /usr/share/man/man1/google-chrome.1.bz2
 * 
 * Package 'www-client/google-chrome-32.0.1700.77_p1' NOT merged due to
 * file collisions. If necessary, refer to your elog messages for the
 * whole content of the above message.

Comment 1 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2014-01-17 15:36:26 UTC

Ah no, that blocker is already in place. The problem I originally saw was of a single slot conflict in /opt/google/chrome/locales (being owned by the previous SLOT).

Comment 2 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2014-01-17 15:42:43 UTC

I can't reproduce this after a downgrade/upgrade. Maybe the :stable version was too old?