Summary: | vim2html-1.40.ebuild (new package) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Tom Martin (RETIRED) <slarti> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
URL: | http://norlug.org/~chipster/vim2html | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | vim2html-1.40.ebuild |
Description
Tom Martin (RETIRED)
2004-04-29 14:05:25 UTC
Created attachment 30345 [details, diff]
vim2html-1.40.ebuild
Is there any advantage to this over the :TOhtml supplied with Vim? - It can use htmltidy for cleaning HTML output (however I suppose what's generated by :TOhtml is hardly bad HTML) - It doesn't require a GUI - Err.. I never knew :TOhtml existed ;) Well, you can do `vim -c ':TOhtml' -c ':wqa' blah.c ` to avoid having to fire up the editor properly, and then run Tidy on the generated file... I'm inclined to close this bug as WONTFIX, on the grounds that there's an existing solution which is pretty much the same, and that adding unnecessary packages to portage is discouraged. Feel free to try to persuade me otherwise if you think there's a considerable advantage to this package over a three line shell script. Not at all, that sounds perfectly reasonable. I didn't actually have any idea about :TOhtml in the first place, so at least I've learnt something :) Resolved. |