Summary: | x11-misc/xautolock should optionally depend on >=x11-misc/slim-1.3.6 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | eroen <erikdenstore+gbugs> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Desktop Misc. Team <desktop-misc> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | andrzej.pauli |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | https://developer.berlios.de/project/shownotes.php?release_id=19463 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | patched ebuild |
Description
eroen
2013-10-22 14:29:28 UTC
As you can't install them simultaneously like that, it is more like this: || ( x11-misc/slimlock >=x11-misc/slim-1.3.6 ) Slim hanging issue reappeared even after downgrading lxsession. Lightdm is fine so far Created attachment 387074 [details]
patched ebuild
corrected ebuild, with x11-misc/slim dependency
Comment on attachment 387074 [details]
patched ebuild
That's silly. The outer || ( ) already suggest you require only one of them. Who suggested this?
+ 20 Oct 2014; Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org> xautolock-2.2.ebuild: + Add alternative dependency on x11-misc/slim (remove x11-misc/slimlock) by + eroen (bug #489018). EAPI bump. + (In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #4) > Comment on attachment 387074 [details] > patched ebuild > > That's silly. The outer || ( ) already suggest you require only one of them. > Who suggested this? as suggested by TomWij. Works for me locally, so I attached it. |