| Summary: | net-im/ejabberd: add systemd unit | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Andrius Štikonas <andrius> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Tim Harder <radhermit> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | net-im, systemd |
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Bug Depends on: | 482446 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 448882 | ||
| Attachments: | ejabberd.service | ||
Does ejabberdctl has any option to not fork? (and, then, allowing the usage of "Type=simple") (In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #1) > Does ejabberdctl has any option to not fork? (and, then, allowing the usage > of "Type=simple") I don't think so. I've looked at the source code of ejabberdctl and the only options are --node --config-dir --config --logs --spool. In that case, no problem then :) epmd unit file was committed as template. Should this ejabberd.service be adjusted as well? I don't know how to do it. (In reply to Andrius Štikonas from comment #4) > epmd unit file was committed as template. Should this ejabberd.service be > adjusted as well? I don't know how to do it. I don't follow you (probably lost the other bug mail), can you elaborate a bit please. Thanks (In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #5) > (In reply to Andrius Štikonas from comment #4) > > epmd unit file was committed as template. Should this ejabberd.service be > > adjusted as well? I don't know how to do it. > > I don't follow you (probably lost the other bug mail), can you elaborate a > bit please. Thanks I've submitted epmd.service file in bug #482446 which is a dependency of ejabberd. However, that file got committed as epmd@.service (but this wasn't explained in that bug). This might be right by I don't know systemd well enough yet to understand it. However, the attached ejabberd.service still looks for epmd.service file and prints Cannot add dependency job for unit epmd.service, ignoring: Unit epmd.service failed to load. No su...details. So I thought that ejabberd.service file has to be modified as well to take into account epmd.service -> epmd@.service change. +*ejabberd-2.1.13-r1 (08 Sep 2013) + + 08 Sep 2013; Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> +ejabberd-2.1.13-r1.ebuild, + +files/ejabberd.service, +files/ejabberd.tmpfiles.conf: + Add unit file (#482444 by Andrius Štikonas) + But different than you, this one is much more similar to Fedora, Mageia and Arch service files (In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #7) > +*ejabberd-2.1.13-r1 (08 Sep 2013) > + > + 08 Sep 2013; Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> +ejabberd-2.1.13-r1.ebuild, > + +files/ejabberd.service, +files/ejabberd.tmpfiles.conf: > + Add unit file (#482444 by Andrius Štikonas) > + > > But different than you, this one is much more similar to Fedora, Mageia and > Arch service files Doesn't Gentoo systemd guidelines say that only one service should be started by a unit file? Now ejabberdctl launches epmd itself (since ejabberd.service does not depend on epmd.service). I think it's being started by ejabberdctl, as it was done in init.d script and as it's done in the other distributions I have seen |
Created attachment 356996 [details] ejabberd.service net-im/ejabberd should provide systemd unit file.