Bug 480276 – Stabilize dev-qt/qt-mobility-1.2.2_p20130703 and net-libs/qmf-4.0.3

• Product: Gentoo Linux
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Description Julian Ospald 2013-08-08 17:14:17 UTC]

Is it ok? It doesn't currently block anything, but I have a dep (net-p2p/retroshare) that will need.

Otherwise I wouldn't mind a more recent snapshot if there is any and go for stabilizing that one.

CC arches if you agree

[Comment 1 Julian Ospald 2013-08-08 17:16:16 UTC]

if you don't want net-libs/qmf stabilized we can just mask the "messaging" useflag then

[Comment 2 Davide Pesavento (RETIRED) 2013-08-08 18:04:55 UTC]

I was actually preparing a snapshot bump for qt-mobility but got distracted by RL issues. I believe it'll happen next week, and I'd rather try to stabilize that if you don't mind waiting an additional 30 days.

qmf-4.0.2 is ok.

[Comment 3 Julian Ospald 2013-08-08 18:05:43 UTC]

(In reply to Davide Pesavento from comment #2)
> I was actually preparing a snapshot bump for qt-mobility but got distracted
> by RL issues. I believe it'll happen next week, and I'd rather try to
> stabilize that if you don't mind waiting an additional 30 days.

That's ok

> 
> qmf-4.0.2 is ok.

Please fix title and CC arches.

[Comment 4 Michael Palimaka (kensington) 2013-08-08 18:11:00 UTC]

(In reply to Davide Pesavento from comment #2)
> qmf-4.0.2 is ok.

FYI, qmf-4.0.3 is recently released (although it mostly seems to be your upstream patches :P).

[Comment 5 Davide Pesavento (RETIRED) 2013-08-08 18:35:11 UTC]

(In reply to Michael Palimaka (kensington) from comment #4)
> FYI, qmf-4.0.3 is recently released (although it mostly seems to be your
> upstream patches :P).

Then I'll bump that too and stabilize qt-mobility and qmf together after 30 days.

[Comment 6 Davide Pesavento (RETIRED) 2013-09-12 10:18:04 UTC]

Arches, please proceed.

[Comment 7 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-09-14 08:14:28 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 8 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-09-14 10:06:32 UTC]

x86 stable. Last arch, closing