Summary: | media-tv/xawtv-3.95-r2 and media-libs/libjpeg-turbo-1.3.0-r2 - error: ‘struct jpeg_compress_struct’ has no member named ‘do_fancy_downsampling’ | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Martin von Gagern <Martin.vGagern> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Television related Applications in Gentoo's Portage <media-tv> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://git.linuxtv.org/xawtv3.git/commitdiff/20d4a7272c16a27e4e43dc94659f825367839bfa | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 479818 | ||
Attachments: | build log |
Description
Martin von Gagern
2013-08-05 15:30:41 UTC
I had a look at this whole jpeg vs. libjpeg-turbo issue and it seems to me that the proper solution is making sure that xawtv doesn't unneccessarily depend on newer libjpeg API and ABI. So I enclosed the relevant line in conv-mjpeg.c in the same kind of preprocessor guard used in the jpeglib.h header. The result compiled just fine, everything looks good. Upstream apparently did the same: http://git.linuxtv.org/xawtv3.git/commitdiff/20d4a7272c16a27e4e43dc94659f825367839bfa So bumping xawtv to 3.103 might be an alternative. Although I suggest you do the patch for the currently stable 3.95-r2 and offer 3.103 for testing first. Do you want a separate bug report to take care of this version bump? xawtv worked fine for libjpeg.so.62 in the past, and support for later jpeg's have been patched in, so surely we can manage reverting the patch / conditionalizing it / ... (In reply to Martin von Gagern from comment #1) > So bumping xawtv to 3.103 might be an alternative. Although I suggest you do > the patch for the currently stable 3.95-r2 and offer 3.103 for testing > first. Thanks for the research! + 06 Aug 2013; Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@gentoo.org> xawtv-3.95-r2.ebuild, + files/xawtv-3.95-jpeg-7.patch: + Install Xawtv app-defaults to correct directory at /usr/share/X11. Fix + building with libjpeg.so.62 API wrt #479848 by Martin von Gagern > Do you want a separate bug report to take care of this version bump? Yes, please. Version bump will need more time I don't have right now, so bug report should be filed. (In reply to Samuli Suominen from comment #3) Thanks for fixing this! > Version bump will need more time I don't have right now, so > bug report should be filed. I see bug #358013 already has a matching bump request. |