| Summary: | [TRACKER] >=media-libs/jpeg-9a porting | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Julian Ospald <hasufell> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Graphics Project <graphics+disabled> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | alexander, asturm, mail, nikoli, pacho, polynomial-c, uwelk |
| Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | Tracker |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| See Also: | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479502 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Bug Depends on: | 479774, 479808, 479848, 479946, 480178, 480182, 480186, 481360, 481688, 483348, 520674, 520726, 520746, 520748, 520882, 520884, 520886, 520888, 520894, 520902, 520904, 520906, 520908, 520932, 520934, 520938, 521198, 521200, 521696, 527508, 533470, 541180, 607424, 646454, 646456 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 516684, 646984 | ||
|
Description
Julian Ospald
2013-08-05 10:54:26 UTC
Great breakage with exactly zero value... (In reply to Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) from comment #1) > Great breakage with exactly zero value... I wasn't expecting senseless comment on a Tracker from a developer, but needless to say, no talking in the Tracker. What I usually try to find in such trackers is the canonical
way of fixing known widespread breakages. And always fail.
One of them seems to be related to bool / boolean type
difference in g-4.7+ (C++ code only?):
which basically means (taken from webkit breakage)
> - if (jpeg_read_header(&m_info, true) == JPEG_SUSPENDED)
> + if (jpeg_read_header(&m_info, TRUE) == JPEG_SUSPENDED)
added multilib and security patched jpeg-8d-r1 since there are so many jpeg-9 bugs left here Anyone following this bug: I could really use some help with the open bugs, like bug 520674 for which I have repeatedly failed to provide a patch to what did happen finally with this breakage? Do we plan to use jpeg-9 ever in stable... I am unsure if broken reverse deps are now "working" simply because most of us are using jpeg-turbo and, hence, not hitting this :/ I also doubt jpeg-9 will ever get used as it seems that release was really controversial... :/, I was wondering if we should simply remove it :| I guess we can close this finally. |
