|Summary:||dev-lang/fpc : does not respect LDFLAGS|
|Product:||Gentoo Linux||Reporter:||Agostino Sarubbo <ago>|
|Component:||Current packages||Assignee:||Amy Liffey <amynka>|
|Severity:||QA||CC:||esigra, hasufell, radhermit|
|Package list:||Runtime testing required:||---|
|Bug Depends on:|
Description Agostino Sarubbo 2013-07-30 10:05:46 UTC
You receive this bug because this package does not respect my system's LDFLAGS ( -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--hash-style=gnu ) * Messages for package dev-lang/fpc-2.6.2: * QA Notice: Files built without respecting LDFLAGS have been detected * Please include the following list of files in your report: * /usr/bin/fpdoc
Comment 1 Julian Ospald 2013-07-30 21:20:11 UTC
This might need more work than it's worth and should not really be a stabilization blocker. Mind that fpc is a toolchain package and needs special carefulness.
Comment 2 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-08-02 15:03:29 UTC
which rule are you following?
Comment 3 Julian Ospald 2013-08-02 15:16:58 UTC
(In reply to Agostino Sarubbo from comment #2) > which rule are you following? the rule that a missing QA_FLAGS_IGNOREDS="foo" is not a reason to block stabilization
Comment 4 Amy Liffey 2016-12-20 09:52:31 UTC
How would you like to see this implememented? Converting all LDFLAGS elements to appropriate -k<x> and hope it will work as expected with FPC linkerscript?
Comment 5 Agostino Sarubbo 2016-12-22 10:20:32 UTC
If technically is not possible use the LDFLAGS, please add a way to hide the issue.
Comment 6 Amy Liffey 2016-12-22 10:34:24 UTC
If it would be technically possible I would not close this bug as invalid.
Comment 7 Agostino Sarubbo 2016-12-22 10:59:05 UTC
Comment 8 Amy Liffey 2016-12-25 11:58:45 UTC
(In reply to Agostino Sarubbo from comment #7) > QA_FLAGS_IGNORED ? However I am not able to reproduce it with 2.6.4 or 3.0.0 version. Can you please confirm that the problem still exist?
Comment 9 Agostino Sarubbo 2016-12-25 19:01:04 UTC
It seems to be fine now.