| Summary: | dev-lang/fpc : does not respect LDFLAGS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Agostino Sarubbo <ago> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Amy Liffey <amynka> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | QA | CC: | esigra, hasufell, radhermit |
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 331933 | ||
This might need more work than it's worth and should not really be a stabilization blocker. Mind that fpc is a toolchain package and needs special carefulness. which rule are you following? (In reply to Agostino Sarubbo from comment #2) > which rule are you following? the rule that a missing QA_FLAGS_IGNOREDS="foo" is not a reason to block stabilization How would you like to see this implememented? Converting all LDFLAGS elements to appropriate -k<x> and hope it will work as expected with FPC linkerscript? If technically is not possible use the LDFLAGS, please add a way to hide the issue. If it would be technically possible I would not close this bug as invalid. QA_FLAGS_IGNORED ? (In reply to Agostino Sarubbo from comment #7) > QA_FLAGS_IGNORED ? However I am not able to reproduce it with 2.6.4 or 3.0.0 version. Can you please confirm that the problem still exist? It seems to be fine now. (In reply to Agostino Sarubbo from comment #9) > It seems to be fine now. Thank you ! |
You receive this bug because this package does not respect my system's LDFLAGS ( -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--hash-style=gnu ) * Messages for package dev-lang/fpc-2.6.2: * QA Notice: Files built without respecting LDFLAGS have been detected * Please include the following list of files in your report: * /usr/bin/fpdoc