| Summary: | sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.10.1: Oops in CIFS security_socket_recvmsg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Alex Brandt (RETIRED) <alunduil> |
| Component: | [OLD] Core system | Assignee: | Gentoo Kernel Bug Wranglers and Kernel Maintainers <kernel> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | linux-3.10.3 | ||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Bug Depends on: | 478006 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
| Attachments: | Kernel Configuration | ||
|
Description
Alex Brandt (RETIRED)
2013-07-17 14:55:17 UTC
Created attachment 353500 [details]
Kernel Configuration
Last working kernel? If you know the last working kernel, would you be able to do a git-bisect? Would you be able to recompile with some debug settings and recreate? Last known working kernel was 3.9.7. I've not been running this process through the 3.9.8 and 3.10.0 updates. I can give those kernels a go if you think it'd be useful (I assume yes). I don't have time to do a git-bisect on my kernel right now but perhaps after next week I could (if we still need it). I certainly can add some debugging statements and recreate the issue. Any debugging settings in particular that I should enable? Otherwise, I can just enable debugging in CIFS systems and see what else pops up. I tested the kernel from gentoo-sources-3.10.0 last night and no Oops occurred with that kernel. The process that caused the Oops on 3.10.1 ran without any problems. Narrows down where the bisect needs to happen anyway. Do you prefer bisects against upstream vanilla or another branch? vanilla Looks like this no longer occurs as of 3.10.3-gentoo-r1. Do we still want to track down the particular commit causing the issue or simply notate the as yet unstable kernels to not go stable? (In reply to Alex Brandt from comment #6) > Looks like this no longer occurs as of 3.10.3-gentoo-r1. Do we still want > to track down the particular commit causing the issue or simply notate the > as yet unstable kernels to not go stable? The stabilization bug for 3.9 is currently blocked; which kernel we want to end up stabilizing might end up being decided in bug #478006, based on that decision we can then see whether to go through with your bisect or not. We plan to stabilize the next 3.10 release. |