Summary: | net-analyzer/ntopng - High-Speed Web-based Traffic Analysis and Flow Collection | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Leonardo Amaral <contato> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Sławek Lis (RETIRED) <slis> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | azamat.hackimov, craig, idl0r, netmon, polynomial-c |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://www.ntop.org/products/ntop/ | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | 526402 | ||
Bug Blocks: | |||
Attachments: |
ntopng-1.2.1.ebuild
ntopng.init.d ntopng-1.2.1.ebuild ntopng-1.2.1.ebuild. ntopng.init.d ntopng-1.2.1.ebuild ntopng.conf.d |
Description
Leonardo Amaral
2013-07-06 16:09:55 UTC
A think since the Link mentioned in the bug says the ntopng is a "start over", i think a new ebuild is preferible instead renaming.. ntopng looks like it's the same mess that is ntop or worse. I gave up. Can you please check that ebuild? Created attachment 389608 [details]
ntopng-1.2.1.ebuild
Created attachment 389610 [details]
ntopng.init.d
Comment on attachment 389608 [details] ntopng-1.2.1.ebuild > # ntopng has hardcoded path in source code so we make this link to make him happy That would make portage QA unhappy. Created attachment 390816 [details]
ntopng-1.2.1.ebuild
Created attachment 393534 [details]
ntopng-1.2.1.ebuild.
Created attachment 393536 [details]
ntopng.init.d
Created attachment 393538 [details]
ntopng-1.2.1.ebuild
Created attachment 393540 [details]
ntopng.conf.d
I've added it into the tree, and waiting for a feedback. It works (amd64) but it's certainly going to take a while to figure out the differences from the original ntop. Where should questions (usage, configuration, ...) go? Also, there is a version 2.0 out. |