| Summary: | netatalk does not restart properly | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Jon Liebold <gentoo> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) <flameeyes> |
| Status: | RESOLVED TEST-REQUEST | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | net-fs, sparc |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | Sparc | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: |
Full netatalk.log file from test restart
Copy of atalkd.conf |
||
|
Description
Jon Liebold
2004-04-09 14:59:35 UTC
Created attachment 28990 [details]
Full netatalk.log file from test restart
This log as generated by a single execution of "/etc/init.d/atalk restart"
Created attachment 28991 [details]
Copy of atalkd.conf
Any clue on this guys? Reassigning to net-fs, this isn't really sparc related. net-fs folks, can you take a look when you get a chance? I'm not a member of the net-fs group yet, but after having worked on netatalk-2.0.1 ebuilds for a while and having a fair amount of experience with netatalk-2.0.1 in the past, I would like to make some observations. 1) I have never seen the behavior of netatalk trying to change the /etc/netatalk/atalkd.conf file. I trust the reporter that it is, but I wonder what configuration option at either run or compiletime is causing that. That doesn't seem SPARC specific, though, and I would count it as one bug, albeit a non-fatal one without the addition of the other bug. 2) What I would count as the other bug is how the kernel does not seem to be recognizing that atalkd freed its address in the past, hence why it can't start up with the same one as it is trying to. I can attest that I do not see this on IA32 or PowerPC32, so I highly suspect it is a bug in the AppleTalk kernel module on SPARC, or _perhaps_ a netatalk bug that only gets exercised on SPARC, something to do with the way netatalk closes the socket or the way the AppleTalk driver handles a socket being closed. I will look into both of these further, though I am prioritizing the second bug as it is rather the more severe one. netatalk needs a developer to take up maintenance. Please try with new netatalk-2.0.3 and report back thanks. |