Summary: | sys-apps/udevil: QA violation in USE=systemd | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Fabio Erculiani (RETIRED) <lxnay> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Julian Ospald <hasufell> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | trivial | CC: | pacho, qa, systemd |
Priority: | Low | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 468898 |
Description
Fabio Erculiani (RETIRED)
![]() Gentle ping ;-) I will pick this issue up when I do a version bump. I will commit in a week if nobody disagrees. Thanks (In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #3) > I will commit in a week if nobody disagrees. Thanks I said I will pick this issue up when I do a version bump, so that is disagreeing, because it does not make sense for people to rebuild the package for this trivial fix. Just don't revbump it then. It's almost 2 months... Actually, almost 3... :/ How does that qualify for a revbump? Revbump is reserved for cases where installed files change. If I don't revbump it, then it will show up in --newuse. I think that people won't mind to rebuild udevil since the last bump was 3 months ago anyway... (In reply to Fabio Erculiani from comment #9) > I think that people won't mind to rebuild udevil since the last bump was 3 > months ago anyway... I cannot follow that logic. Please allow us to commit the fix, since it's blocking our bug tracker for almost 3 months now. (In reply to Fabio Erculiani from comment #11) > Please allow us to commit the fix, since it's blocking our bug tracker for > almost 3 months now. That's not what "common sense" means to me. I don't care about the bug tracker, but about the question in what way it improves the ebuild for the USER. I am aware that it is policy now to not use "systemd" useflags and I WILL follow that policy. Since development on udevil is active I expect a lot more releases and can fix this trivial gentoo-specific policy issue then. QA: what should we do? The take about fixing on bump sounds sensible, assuming udevil will get a release anytime soon. The "violation" and the package are small enough to make quite pointless argue on the timing of the bump IMHO. Since probably Fabio has a specific need for it within a certain timeframe I'd suggest to agree on a date and bump on that if nothing happens. + 12 Aug 2013; Julian Ospald <hasufell@gentoo.org> udevil-0.4.1.ebuild: + remove systemd useflag wrt #465596 |