Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 462360

Summary: dev-ml/ocaml-gettext - ~x86 keyword request
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: Andreis Vinogradovs ( slepnoga ) <andreis.vinogradovs>
Component: [OLD] Keywording and StabilizationAssignee: Gentoo Developers for the x86 Architecture <x86>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: enhancement CC: ml
Priority: Normal Keywords: KEYWORDREQ
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Description Andreis Vinogradovs ( slepnoga ) 2013-03-19 19:40:27 UTC
Please test and keyword dev-ml/ocaml-gettext on x86
Comment 1 Vicente Olivert Riera (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-05-12 11:13:22 UTC
We would need to keyword =dev-ml/ocaml-fileutils-0.4.0 first.
Comment 2 Vicente Olivert Riera (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-05-12 11:49:01 UTC
I think they are not ready to keyword:


qemu-x86 ~ # cat ocaml-fileutils.report 
USE='-doc -ocamlopt'  succeeded for =dev-ml/ocaml-fileutils-0.4.4
USE='doc -ocamlopt'  succeeded for =dev-ml/ocaml-fileutils-0.4.4
USE='-doc ocamlopt'  failed for =dev-ml/ocaml-fileutils-0.4.4
USE='doc ocamlopt'  failed for =dev-ml/ocaml-fileutils-0.4.4
FEATURES= test failed for =dev-ml/ocaml-fileutils-0.4.4

qemu-x86 ~ # cat ocaml-gettext.report 
USE='-doc'  failed for =dev-ml/ocaml-gettext-0.3.4
USE='doc'  failed for =dev-ml/ocaml-gettext-0.3.4
FEATURES= test failed for =dev-ml/ocaml-gettext-0.3.4
Comment 3 Sergey Popov gentoo-dev 2013-05-12 11:56:02 UTC
Readding maintainers to CC, let's see what they think about this
Comment 4 Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev 2013-05-12 15:04:41 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Readding maintainers to CC, let's see what they think about this

without the actual failures and bugs opened it is difficult to think anything about this :)
Comment 5 Markus Meier gentoo-dev 2013-08-24 13:20:32 UTC
(In reply to Alexis Ballier from comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Readding maintainers to CC, let's see what they think about this
> 
> without the actual failures and bugs opened it is difficult to think
> anything about this :)

yes. Please open separate bugs for the test failures. ~x86 added, closing.