| Summary: | xorg-2.eclass : Support verbose build log | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Agostino Sarubbo <ago> |
| Component: | Eclasses | Assignee: | Gentoo X packagers <x11> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: | patch | ||
Please mark the 50+ bugs for individual packages inheriting xorg-2 as duplicates of this. (In reply to comment #1) > Please mark the 50+ bugs for individual packages inheriting xorg-2 as > duplicates of this. Why a package that does not have a verbose log should be marked as a duplicate of a patch for an eclass? I guess they can be marked fixed after push this patch. (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Please mark the 50+ bugs for individual packages inheriting xorg-2 as > > duplicates of this. > > Why a package that does not have a verbose log should be marked as a > duplicate of a patch for an eclass? I guess they can be marked fixed after > push this patch. Because they're all symptoms of the same problem. Patch sent to gentoo-dev@ ulm says that econf already specifies --disable-silent-rules in EAPIs 5 and 6. Only deprecated EAPIs would be affected (EAPIs 3 and 4), so it's not work it. Closing as WONTFIX. |
Created attachment 339160 [details] patch I just used the same logic of --disable--dependency-tracking: # Check if package supports a verbose build if grep -q -s "disable-silent-rules" ${ECONF_SOURCE:-.}/configure; then local no_silent="--disable-silent-rules" fi attached a diff