Summary: | repoman is incompatible with the funtoo-overlay | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Portage Development | Reporter: | Richard Yao (RETIRED) <ryao> |
Component: | Repoman | Assignee: | Portage team <dev-portage> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | drobbins |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | Goal, REGRESSION |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | Funtoo's profile.desc |
Description
Richard Yao (RETIRED)
2013-02-06 03:23:18 UTC
Repoman uses the values from profiles/arch.list to validate the first column of profiles.desc. I guess maybe funtoo has patch repoman to make it handle profiles.desc differently? Whatever the difference is, we could use a setting in metadata/layout.conf to make repoman handle profiles.desc differently. That's how we typically handle extensions like this. (In reply to comment #1) > Repoman uses the values from profiles/arch.list to validate the first column > of profiles.desc. I guess maybe funtoo has patch repoman to make it handle > profiles.desc differently? Funtoo has no such patch and profiles/arch.list is unchanged from Gentoo's main tree. (In reply to comment #2) > Whatever the difference is, we could use a setting in metadata/layout.conf > to make repoman handle profiles.desc differently. That's how we typically > handle extensions like this. That will likely require a specification of the semantics of the extension. I hope that drobbins will find time to provide that. With the stage 3 re-write of the repoman code, repoman should be fully plug-able and configurable. This can include addtional checks and plug-in modules to perform them. or even just a reduced set of checks. It will all be controlled via the repository in the metadata directory. repoman support has been removed per bug 835013. Please file a new bug (or, I suppose, reopen this one) if you feel this check is still applicable to pkgcheck and doesn't already exist. |