Summary: | sci-biology/mira-3.4.0.2 - libtool: Version mismatch error. This is libtool 2.4, but the definition of this LT_INIT comes from libtool 2.4.2. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Martin Mokrejš <mmokrejs> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Science Biology related packages <sci-biology> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | weaver |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | build.log |
Description
Martin Mokrejš
2013-01-05 01:48:58 UTC
Unreproducable here. Does this always happen? I re-tried and still happens with 3.4.0.2 on same host. Also happens with 3.4.1.1 on that host. I even tried 3.9.9 but hit some other error earlier. Upgrade from libtool-2.4 to 2.4.2 helped. ;-) Just introduce version deps in the ebuild. And I just asked upstream to introduce a version check in configure. I just throwed the two ebuilds into sci overlay to promote testing. ;-) Had to change URL to fetch from sourceforge instead of gentoo mirror, of course, and the 3.4.0.2 is only available as tar.gz instead of tar.bz2. +*mira-3.4.1.1 (22 Feb 2013) +*mira-3.9.9 (22 Feb 2013) + + 22 Feb 2013; Martin Mokrejs <mmokrejs@fold.natur.cuni.cz> + +files/mira-3.4.0.2-boost-1.50.patch, +mira-3.4.1.1.ebuild, + +mira-3.9.9.ebuild: + sci-biology/mira: current stable and development version bumps Cool thanks for the bump. Could you please fix following errors in the buildsystem? * Compiler optimisation flags used ................. -O3 -funroll-loops * boost libs are added to LDFLAGS instead of LIBS or BOOST_LIBS (In reply to comment #5) > Cool thanks for the bump. > > Could you please fix following errors in the buildsystem? > > * Compiler optimisation flags used ................. -O3 -funroll-loops > * boost libs are added to LDFLAGS instead of LIBS or BOOST_LIBS I pointed author of mira to this bug report so I hope we will get an upstream patch soon. ;-) Or I look into it in a week a so. On Feb 22, 2013, at 1:26 , Martin Mokrejs <mmokrejs@fold.natur.cuni.cz> wrote: > And, maybe you would like to introduce some sanity check in configure > for user's libtool version to be >= of your own version used to create > the files in the tar ball: Thanks a lot for pointing that out, I added a check in the 3.9.x branch. Won't be back ported to 3.4.x though :-) B. So, the ebuild for 3.4.x needs to require a libtool >=2.4.2. Will ask Bastien what happened with the boost LDFLAGS vs. LIBS handling. +*mira-3.9.18 (07 Jul 2013) + + 07 Jul 2013; Justin Lecher <jlec@gentoo.org> +mira-3.9.18.ebuild: + Version BUmp; fixed compilation with dev-libs/boost-1.53.0 and some libtool + versions, #450322; thanks Martin Mokrejs for all his work + |