Summary: | Init script for freenet thinks that JVM:s don't yet support NPTL, but at least >= sun-jdk-1.4.2.03 does. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Niklas Herder <herder> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Jeremy Huddleston (RETIRED) <eradicator> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | zx |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Niklas Herder
2004-03-18 00:38:07 UTC
This is more for the net-p2p crowd... zx: I'm temporarily handling net-p2p stuff until someone can come along to claim it... but I have not idea what should be done here... is there a way to check if the java vm supports nptl? should I just check the --version? do blackdown-1.4.2 and ibm support nptl? NPTL is binary-compatible with LinuxThreads, so I think that would be safe. The easiest thing to do is just test the other VM:s and try to start freenet with them. I don't see why they wouldn't work, but just in case :-) herder: AFAIK, NPTL "should be" compatible with LinuxThreads... which is in reality not the same as "is"... I'm curious why that LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 is there in the first place... Yeah, but since the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL breaks freenet totally, I think it would be better to remove that row, since it's there because of NPTL in the first place. I haven't tried it on a non-NPTL kernel, though. fixed in portage. |