Summary: | =app-text/texlive-2012: please stabilize | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | poletti.marco |
Component: | [OLD] Keywording and Stabilization | Assignee: | TeX project <tex> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | gentoo.2019, matija, mrueg |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | STABLEREQ |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | 399781, 406045, 428350, 446528, 465748, 466700 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 412499 | ||
Attachments: |
list
new list |
Description
poletti.marco
2012-12-30 13:12:37 UTC
Created attachment 345356 [details]
list
list, grabbed from gnome-overlay tools
ok, it should be good to go now, arches please go ahead, see attached list. (In reply to comment #2) > ok, it should be good to go now, arches please go ahead, see attached list. This list is not fine for repoman. Please recheck it. (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > ok, it should be good to go now, arches please go ahead, see attached list. > > This list is not fine for repoman. Please recheck it. you mean I shouldn't trust the script :) what are the errors ? I thought I included all (tex or myself maintained) app-text/texlive{,-core} deps (In reply to comment #4) > you mean I shouldn't trust the script :) > > what are the errors ? I thought I included all (tex or myself maintained) > app-text/texlive{,-core} deps I see different error per arch. For amd64 atm I see: dependency.bad 9 app-text/texlive/texlive-2012.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0) ['app-text/epspdf'] app-text/texlive/texlive-2012.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop) ['app-text/epspdf'] app-text/texlive/texlive-2012.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome) ['app-text/epspdf'] app-text/texlive/texlive-2012.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/kde) ['app-text/epspdf'] app-text/texlive/texlive-2012.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/developer) ['app-text/epspdf'] app-text/texlive/texlive-2012.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64) ['app-text/epspdf'] app-text/texlive/texlive-2012.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib) ['app-text/epspdf'] app-text/texlive/texlive-2012.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/selinux) ['app-text/epspdf'] app-text/texlive/texlive-2012.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/selinux) ['app-text/epspdf'] Created attachment 345666 [details]
new list
yep, sorry, I forgot this one... it was long overdue (from tl-2011-r1 but not from current stable tl-2011...)
(In reply to comment #6) > Created attachment 345666 [details] > new list > > yep, sorry, I forgot this one... it was long overdue (from tl-2011-r1 but > not from current stable tl-2011...) Amd64 sounds good now. What about bug 465748 ? Stable for HPPA. (In reply to comment #7) > What about bug 465748 ? Well, I probably can patch it to increase the buffer size but since dev-libs/icu has the same code and this program is not installed but rather only used to generate some other files: do we really care about this ? (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #7) > > What about bug 465748 ? > > Well, I probably can patch it to increase the buffer size but since > dev-libs/icu has the same code and this program is not installed but rather > only used to generate some other files: do we really care about this ? If this is trivial I'd like to see it fixed before go ahead amd64 stable x86 stable ppc stable ppc64 stable ia64 stable alpha stable arm stable sparc stable s390 stable sh stable. Last arch, closing |