Summary: | [PATCH] <sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.99: mlock fails on ARM | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Matija "hook" Šuklje <matija> |
Component: | [OLD] Core system | Assignee: | Robin Johnson <robbat2> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | agk, cardoe, proxy-maint |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | PATCH |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | ARM | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Matija "hook" Šuklje
2012-12-22 22:51:42 UTC
I tried the patch manually and it works fine. Changing back to critical, as upstream says without it, LVM2 is unusable on some ARM arches. Please don't re-assign the severity of the bugs. It's the maintainer who needs to decide that. (In reply to comment #2) > Please don't re-assign the severity of the bugs. It's the maintainer who > needs to decide that. I was not aware of that. Sorry, will not do it again. I created an ebuild with mentioned one-liner fix and now I'm getting this: vgchange -a y device-mapper: resume ioctl on failed: Invalid argument Unable to resume data--vg-data (254:0) 1 logical volume(s) in volume group "data-vg" now active lvm version LVM version: 2.02.98(2) (2012-10-15) Library version: 1.02.77 (2012-10-15) Driver version: 4.23.0 Could you please post more info about how did you manage it to work? Thanks (In reply to comment #4) > I created an ebuild with mentioned one-liner fix and now I'm getting this: > > vgchange -a y > device-mapper: resume ioctl on failed: Invalid argument > Unable to resume data--vg-data (254:0) > 1 logical volume(s) in volume group "data-vg" now active > > lvm version > LVM version: 2.02.98(2) (2012-10-15) > Library version: 1.02.77 (2012-10-15) > Driver version: 4.23.0 > > Could you please post more info about how did you manage it to work? > Thanks I vaguely recall there was something with the `vgchange -a y`, but I think ultimately it was just that it worked even if it complained at start. As per $subject with <2.02.99 it implies 2.02.99 is fixed. Also, 2.02.100 is now in Portage. No need to keep this bug open, next stabilization will take care of this. |