Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 446812

Summary: dev-util/intel-ocl-sdk - !!! newins: usr/lib/libOpenCL.so does not exist
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: Roland Haeder <r.haeder>
Component: [OLD] DevelopmentAssignee: Kacper Kowalik (Xarthisius) (RETIRED) <xarthisius>
Status: RESOLVED INVALID    
Severity: normal    
Priority: Normal    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: x86   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---
Attachments: emerge --info (ufed-session ;-) )
build.log

Description Roland Haeder 2012-12-10 22:53:57 UTC
I use the latest "emerge --sync" (nothing experimental or so) and did this:

# emerge bfgminer

... and I ended up with the named package not being able to build. The package is extracted to /var/tmp/portage/dev-util/intel-ocl-sdk-2.0.31360/. The directory "work/" contains:

<pre>work # ls -l
total 28224
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root     4096 Dec 10 23:41 etc
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 28866964 Mar 21  2012 intel_ocl_sdk_2012_x64.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root    23751 Mar 21  2012 license.txt
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root     4096 Dec 10 23:41 usr</pre>

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Just use a 32-bit system and try to install one of the bitcoin miners (bfgminer was my choice).
Actual Results:  
>>> Install intel-ocl-sdk-2.0.31360 into /var/tmp/portage/dev-util/intel-ocl-sdk-2.0.31360/image/ category dev-util
 * ERROR: dev-util/intel-ocl-sdk-2.0.31360 failed (install phase):
 *   !!! newins: usr/lib/libOpenCL.so does not exist
 * 
 * If you need support, post the output of `emerge --info '=dev-util/intel-ocl-sdk-2.0.31360'`,
 * the complete build log and the output of `emerge -pqv '=dev-util/intel-ocl-sdk-2.0.31360'`.
 * The complete build log is located at '/var/tmp/portage/dev-util/intel-ocl-sdk-2.0.31360/temp/build.log'.
 * The ebuild environment file is located at '/var/tmp/portage/dev-util/intel-ocl-sdk-2.0.31360/temp/environment'.
 * Working directory: '/var/tmp/portage/dev-util/intel-ocl-sdk-2.0.31360/work'
 * S: '/var/tmp/portage/dev-util/intel-ocl-sdk-2.0.31360/work'

 * Messages for package dev-util/intel-ocl-sdk-2.0.31360:

 * ERROR: dev-util/intel-ocl-sdk-2.0.31360 failed (install phase):
 *   !!! newins: usr/lib/libOpenCL.so does not exist
 * 
 * If you need support, post the output of `emerge --info '=dev-util/intel-ocl-sdk-2.0.31360'`,
 * the complete build log and the output of `emerge -pqv '=dev-util/intel-ocl-sdk-2.0.31360'`.
 * The complete build log is located at '/var/tmp/portage/dev-util/intel-ocl-sdk-2.0.31360/temp/build.log'.
 * The ebuild environment file is located at '/var/tmp/portage/dev-util/intel-ocl-sdk-2.0.31360/temp/environment'.
 * Working directory: '/var/tmp/portage/dev-util/intel-ocl-sdk-2.0.31360/work'
 * S: '/var/tmp/portage/dev-util/intel-ocl-sdk-2.0.31360/work'
Comment 1 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-12-11 15:11:59 UTC
1) Please post your `emerge --info' output in a comment.
2) Please attach the entire build log to this bug report.
Comment 2 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-12-11 16:28:17 UTC
Wait, this is keyworded -x86.
Comment 3 Roland Haeder 2012-12-11 20:10:42 UTC
???
Comment 4 Roland Haeder 2012-12-11 20:46:37 UTC
Created attachment 332066 [details]
emerge --info (ufed-session ;-) )
Comment 5 Roland Haeder 2012-12-11 20:48:20 UTC
Created attachment 332068 [details]
build.log
Comment 6 Roland Haeder 2012-12-11 23:01:11 UTC
I don't understand why this got marked as invalid? I still have the same error message when I try to install dev-util/intel-ocl-sdk-2.0.31360.

Here is the relevant line:
[ebuild  N    *] dev-util/intel-ocl-sdk-2.0.31360  USE="-tools" 0 kB

Here is packages.accept_keywords:
#required by virtual/opencl-0-r2, required by net-misc/bfgminer-2.9.4, required by bfgminer (argument)
=dev-util/intel-ocl-sdk-2.0.31360 **

And package.license:
#required by virtual/opencl-0-r2, required by net-misc/bfgminer-2.9.4, required by bfgminer (argument)
>=dev-util/intel-ocl-sdk-2.0.31360 Intel-SDP
Comment 7 Roland Haeder 2012-12-11 23:05:58 UTC
Sorry for marking it UNCONFIRMED again. :)
Comment 8 Kacper Kowalik (Xarthisius) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-12-12 08:48:28 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> I don't understand why this got marked as invalid? 
Because that package has -x86 for a reason: it *doesn't* contain 32bit version of libraries. Now please stop spamming this bug.