| Summary: | app-backup/tsm: LICENSE doesn't reflect actual license of package | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Ulrich Müller <ulm> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Martin von Gagern <Martin.vGagern> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | licenses, pacho |
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 436214 | ||
|
Description
Ulrich Müller
2012-11-23 09:30:51 UTC
Looks like relevant file is notices.txt, the problem is that I don't know how to fit most of its LICENSEs with current in tree ones apart of: Apache-1.1, Apache-2.0, JDOM, public-domain, Boost-1.0, CPL(0,5 or 1??)... But there are really a ton :S notices.txt includes all of the following: "Apache-1.1 Apache-2.0 JDOM BSD-2 CC-PD Boost-1.0 MIT CPL-1.0 HPND Exolab dom4j EPL-1.0 FTL icu unicode IBM Info-ZIP jaxen LGPL-2 LGPL-2.1 openafs-krb5-a mx4j ZLIB MPL-1.0 MPL-1.1 NPL-1.1 openssl OPENLDAP RSA public-domain W3C || ( BSD GPL-2+ ) gSOAP libpng" Plus several others that we don't have yet. Especially, some of them just consist of a copyright notice plus "All Rights Reserved". However, the file also says: | Please note: This Notices file may identify information that is not used | by, or that was not shipped with, the Program as Licensee installed it. So, it's not clear to me if notices.txt is right. Maybe just use LA_en.txt as new license file? (In reply to comment #2) > notices.txt includes all of the following: > > "Apache-1.1 Apache-2.0 JDOM BSD-2 CC-PD Boost-1.0 MIT CPL-1.0 HPND Exolab > dom4j EPL-1.0 FTL icu unicode IBM Info-ZIP jaxen LGPL-2 LGPL-2.1 > openafs-krb5-a mx4j ZLIB MPL-1.0 MPL-1.1 NPL-1.1 openssl OPENLDAP RSA > public-domain W3C || ( BSD GPL-2+ ) gSOAP libpng" Thanks a lot for catching all of them > > Plus several others that we don't have yet. Especially, some of them just > consist of a copyright notice plus "All Rights Reserved". > Yeah, I had no idea about how to handle that cases :/, looks like there is no problem on not adding a lot of files to licenses/ to simply show "All Rights Reserved" by each one... > However, the file also says: > | Please note: This Notices file may identify information that is not used > | by, or that was not shipped with, the Program as Licensee installed it. > > So, it's not clear to me if notices.txt is right. Maybe just use LA_en.txt > as new license file? I agree +*tsm-6.2.2.0-r2 (16 Dec 2012) +*tsm-6.4.0.0 (16 Dec 2012) +*tsm-6.3.0.5-r2 (16 Dec 2012) + + 16 Dec 2012; Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> +files/dsmcad.init.d-r1, + +tsm-6.2.2.0-r2.ebuild, +tsm-6.3.0.5-r2.ebuild, +tsm-6.4.0.0.ebuild, + -tsm-6.2.2.0-r1.ebuild, -tsm-6.3.0.0-r1.ebuild, -tsm-6.3.0.5-r1.ebuild: + Version bump (#446896 by Chris Shelton), also fix licenses (#444412 by Ulrich + Müller) and fix init.d script (#442878 by Mads). Thanks to Martin von Gagern + for the work. Drop old. + |