Summary: | media-libs/libdlna-0.2.4: fails to build with media-video/libav-9 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) <flameeyes> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | No maintainer - Look at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers if you want to take care of it <maintainer-needed> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | hwoarang |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | NeedPatch |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | https://tinderboxlogs.s3.amazonaws.com/tbamd64.excelsior.flameeyes.eu/media-libs%3Alibdlna-0.2.4%3A20121115-052134.html | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 443230 |
Description
Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED)
2012-11-15 05:37:56 UTC
@hwoarang, your package media-video/ushare is the only (optional) consumer and upstream is dead, do you this package is worth keeping? OK with treecleaning both? treecleaning this is wrong media-video/libav-9 is not in arch, not in ~arch, but p.masked until this is a real problem (like when libav-9 hits stable arch), there is no reason to treeclean this, no matter if upstream is dead or not Looks like people think it's too soon to kill packages only because they are incompatible with (still hardmasked) libav-9 (In reply to comment #4) > Looks like people think it's too soon to kill packages only because they are > incompatible with (still hardmasked) libav-9 I am fine with removing this package but I need to make sure ushare works (at least for me) without the libdlna support. If it does not, we will see what happens (In reply to comment #5) > I am fine with removing this package but I need to make sure ushare works > (at least for me) without the libdlna support. If it does not, we will see > what happens i second this! ushare is then only dlna server package, that i could build on my router with uClibc looks more like -ldlna doesn't expose the symbols from libavformat gold linker ? No gold linker or you'd have seen it written clearly. This is Binutils 2.23 though, which does behave a bit more like gold. the fix was simple enough apparently. |