Bug 440730 – media-libs/mesa-8.0.5 version bump

• Product: Gentoo Linux
• Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE

[Description Andreas Sturmlechner 2012-11-01 14:01:31 UTC]

Created attachment 327934 [details, diff]
mesa-8.0.5.ebuild

Release notes: http://www.mesa3d.org/relnotes-8.0.5.html

This version finally resolves a long-standing texture bug for GM45: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48120#c10

More importantly, a new emul-linux-x86-xlibs bump based on this version would solve bug 405473.

The attached ebuild was test-compiled and installed, should be fine, it just needs a new mesa-8.0.5-gentoo-patches-01.tar.bz2 without obsolete 0004-cve-2012-2864.patch

[Comment 1 Andreas Sturmlechner 2012-11-01 14:02:16 UTC]

Comment on attachment 327934 [details, diff]
mesa-8.0.5.ebuild

>--- a/mesa-8.0.4-r1.ebuild	2012-10-04 11:01:20.000000000 +0200
>+++ b/mesa-8.0.5.ebuild	2012-11-01 14:55:19.398264515 +0100
>@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
> 	video_cards_vmware? ( gallium )
> "
> 
>-LIBDRM_DEPSTRING=">=x11-libs/libdrm-2.4.32"
>+LIBDRM_DEPSTRING=">=x11-libs/libdrm-2.4.33"
> # not a runtime dependency of this package, but dependency of packages which
> # depend on this package, bug #342393
> EXTERNAL_DEPEND="

[Comment 2 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn 2012-11-01 15:27:33 UTC]

What does 8.0.5 offer over 9.0, or why would someone not want to use 9.0 instead?

[Comment 3 Andreas Sturmlechner 2012-11-01 15:34:18 UTC]

I'm perfectly fine with using mesa-9.0, but the latest emul-linux packages bump which I tested only included mesa-8.0.4 despite being stamped 20121028.

So just in case there is anything holding back mesa-9.0 I opened this bug (supposing this is a precondition for getting a higher version for an emul-linux bump).

[Comment 4 Andreas Sturmlechner 2012-11-02 01:00:31 UTC]

Closing, given the stabilisation list in bug 440872.