| Summary: | scrot 0.6 doesn't compile | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Markus Rothe (RETIRED) <corsair> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Graphics Project <graphics+disabled> |
| Status: | RESOLVED TEST-REQUEST | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | flash3001, k |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | x86 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: | Patch for scrot-0.6 to make it work with the latest giblib | ||
|
Description
Markus Rothe (RETIRED)
2004-03-03 09:22:14 UTC
0.6 fails in the same way for me-- the references to 'eprintf' and friends probably are supposed to be handled by giblib, but with giblib-1.2.3, the latest default, the exported interface is 'gib_eprintf', etc.Perhaps scrot-0.6 requires an older version of giblib. Regardless, scrot-0.8 builds fine, and seems to work. I made a patch, could you test it ? Created attachment 27949 [details, diff]
Patch for scrot-0.6 to make it work with the latest giblib
Test the software itself too ! =)
well... I don't have the knowledge to test it, but I'll try to google for it this afternoon. I added the following lines in the ebuild and now it compiles and works:
src_unpack() {
unpack ${A}
cd ${S}
epatch ${FILESDIR}/scrot-patch.diff
}
(and of cause I put the patch in the correct directory)
By the way: What should I mark this bug now? Maybe "WORKSFORME"??
Hmm TEST-REQUEST would be better, isn't it ? ok... Is there an ebuild I can test out ? It is probaly easyer to use the ~x86 version of scrot... I use it since month and hadn't had any problems. Markus s/probaly/probably Are there any objections to unmasking the current ~x86 version ? no... ;-) Markus |