Summary: | media-gfx/fontforge-20120731 version bump | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Ivan S. Titov <iohann.s.titov> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Fonts Team <fonts> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | mrueg, nikitavolchenkov, nirbheek, pacho, raphead |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://sourceforge.net/projects/fontforge/files/fontforge-source/ | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
Updated ebuild for FontForge 20120731
fontforge-20120731.ebuild.diff |
Description
Ivan S. Titov
2012-08-04 22:09:02 UTC
Created attachment 323082 [details]
Updated ebuild for FontForge 20120731
(In reply to comment #1) > Created attachment 323082 [details] > Updated ebuild for FontForge 20120731 please only attach DIFFS for ebuild updates could someone take care of this bump plz? Created attachment 324656 [details, diff]
fontforge-20120731.ebuild.diff
diff + eapi=4.
*** Bug 462992 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** When will this hit portage? Adding nirbheek as he commited fontforge-20120731 to the tree. Please check the diff I attached. Manuel, could you, please, "rebase" your diff? Also I have few questions: 1. why did patches were dropped? 2. is KEYWORDS change really necessary there? 3. why were AUTHORS dropped from dodoc? nirbheek looks like there is older version (with -b in taball name) that we should use. Sorry I don't remember why I did these changes. |