Summary: | =dev-ruby/tins-0.3.14: compiles okay but fails tests on ppc64 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Anthony Basile <blueness> |
Component: | [OLD] Development | Assignee: | Gentoo Ruby Team <ruby> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 428454 |
Description
Anthony Basile
2012-07-30 19:41:50 UTC
Interestingly enough, tins-0.4.3 passes. (In reply to comment #0) > 1) Failure: > test_check_directory_without_access(Tins::FindTest) Can you confirm that you are not using FEATURES=userpriv (i.e., running the test as root)? (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #0) > > > 1) Failure: > > test_check_directory_without_access(Tins::FindTest) > > Can you confirm that you are not using FEATURES=userpriv (i.e., running the > test as root)? I am not using FEATURES=userpriv. I am doing this in a chroot, but would that matter? (In reply to comment #3) > I am not using FEATURES=userpriv. I am doing this in a chroot, but would > that matter? No, it matters that you are running them as root. That test tries to test file permissions, but as root you can read everything anyway. tins 0.4.3 guards against that by not running the test. I guess for tins 0.3.14 we'll just skip that test altogether. (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > > I am not using FEATURES=userpriv. I am doing this in a chroot, but would > > that matter? > > No, it matters that you are running them as root. That test tries to test > file permissions, but as root you can read everything anyway. tins 0.4.3 > guards against that by not running the test. I guess for tins 0.3.14 we'll > just skip that test altogether. Not being familiar with the test I assumed it should be run as root. |