Summary: | dev-ruby/amatch-0.2.10 and dependencies stable request | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Hans de Graaff <graaff> |
Component: | [OLD] Keywording and Stabilization | Assignee: | Gentoo Ruby Team <ruby> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | STABLEREQ |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | 420709, 428704 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Hans de Graaff
![]() ![]() Why only ppc64 and x86? I see KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~hppa ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86". I can do both ppc and ppc64. x86 stable (In reply to comment #1) > Why only ppc64 and x86? I see KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~hppa ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86". I > can do both ppc and ppc64. Because these are the only arches that already have a stable keyword, and I think new stable keywords should be added only on user request. (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Why only ppc64 and x86? I see KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~hppa ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86". I > > can do both ppc and ppc64. > > Because these are the only arches that already have a stable keyword, and I > think new stable keywords should be added only on user request. Okay, I asked because its usually ppc that everyone wants stabilized, not ppc64. This time its the other way around. Anyhow, with FEATURES="test" we need to stabilize: =dev-ruby/test-unit-2.4.8 =dev-ruby/tins-0.3.14 =dev-ruby/amatch-0.2.10 So far test-unit-2.4.8 is fine, so I marked it stable. tins-0.3.14 fails its tests, I'll open a blocking bug, however, tins-0.4.3 passes. amatch-0.2.10 also passes but we'll wait for its dep to be fixed. Stable ppc64. Closing as the last arch. |