Summary: | net-wireless/bluez-4.99 expected specifier-qualifier-list before ‘typeof’ in bluetooth.h | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | W. Trevor King <wking> |
Component: | [OLD] Library | Assignee: | Pacho Ramos <pacho> |
Status: | RESOLVED TEST-REQUEST | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | toolchain |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | PATCH |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | AMD64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
Log of failing build.
emerge --info Patch from Debian (http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/bluez/4.101-1/09_fix_ftbfs_with_c99.patch) |
Description
W. Trevor King
2012-07-27 09:54:59 UTC
Created attachment 319372 [details]
emerge --info
Created attachment 319374 [details, diff] Patch from Debian (http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/bluez/4.101-1/09_fix_ftbfs_with_c99.patch) I can confirm that the patch does fix the issue for me. The patch made it into the upstream mailing list back in March, but doesn't seem to be included in their repository yet. I've bumped them, and will report back on what I hear. It could be a gcc bug per: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786966#c5 reassigning to pacho (thanks!) since I stepped down as maintainer for bluez (In reply to comment #4) > It could be a gcc bug per: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786966#c5 But no idea about what gcc version includes a fix for that (In reply to comment #3) > I've bumped them, and will report back on what I hear. Thanks Pacho for pushing this forward! Upstream threads (so others don't need to dig through Gmane): http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/20372 (2012-01-16) http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/22306 (2012-03-05) http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/27931 (2012-07-29) Still valid with gcc-4.6.3? (In reply to comment #8) > Still valid with gcc-4.6.3? Yeah, I got the same error using gcc-4.6.3 and bluez-4.101-r5. And with gcc-4.7.3-r1? (In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #10) > And with gcc-4.7.3-r1? I'll let you know once something in the 4.7 series stabilizes ;). It's in progress :) https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467274 |