Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 42580

Summary: pgp-patch for abook
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: Mathias Gumz <akira>
Component: New packagesAssignee: Net-Mail Packages <net-mail+disabled>
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX    
Severity: enhancement CC: asolokha, wschlich
Priority: High    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---
Attachments: patch to add pgp - entries to abook

Description Mathias Gumz 2004-02-23 05:54:02 UTC
the patch taken from http://www.net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~robin/abook/ adds pgp-entries to abook. i have done a demo-ebuild (http://darkshed.net/files/gentoo/ebuilds/) but will attach only the patch here since its just one line in the ebuild.

regards,
mathias

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Comment 1 Mathias Gumz 2004-02-23 05:54:52 UTC
Created attachment 26154 [details, diff]
patch to add pgp - entries to abook
Comment 2 Don Seiler (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-02-23 17:44:18 UTC
Is this patch going to be folded into their main trunk?  I'm on the abook-devel list and haven't heard anything about it.

Also perhaps this patch should be contingent on a USE flag.
Comment 3 Mathias Gumz 2004-02-24 01:17:56 UTC
i spoke with the author of the patch and he told me, iirc, that he announced this patch to the main-tree/people/whatever. no reaction so far. perhaps this will be a good start to show, that this patch makes sense?.

usaflag: sure

regards,
mathias
Comment 4 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-07 18:16:01 UTC
Re-assign wrt Bug 22118
Comment 5 Arseny Solokha 2009-09-30 15:54:55 UTC
The only version of abook in today's portage tree is 0.5.6. This patch isn't applicable to it and should be rewritten or rejected completely. I could try to adapt it for the current version if maintainers consider not to drop it out.
Comment 6 Torsten Veller (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-10-17 18:36:51 UTC
Adding an unmaintained extension for an unmaintained(?) package is probably not what we want.
So until upstream isn't active, this won't be fixed.

Thanks